2000
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.11.11.3873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Distribution during Chemotactic Responses

Abstract: To determine the distribution of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) on the surface of cells responding to EGF as a chemoattractant, an EGFR-green fluorescent protein chimera was expressed in the MTLn3 mammary carcinoma cell line. The chimera was functional and easily visualized on the cell surface. In contrast to other studies indicating that the EGFR might be localized to certain regions of the plasma membrane, we found that the chimera is homogeneously distributed on the plasma membrane and be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Under quiescent conditions, the EGFR was localized primarily at the cell surface (Figure 8a). Exposure of the cells to EGF evoked a rapid mobilization of the receptor into cytoplasmic vesicles (Figure 8b), in agreement with previous studies (Carter and Sorkin, 1998;Bailly et al, 2000;Carpenter, 2000). In contrast, exposure of the cells to either recombinant protein did not cause any appreciable EGFR movement into the cytoplasm (Figure 8c-f).…”
Section: Lrig1 Induces Neither Egfr Internalization Nor Egfr Phosphorsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under quiescent conditions, the EGFR was localized primarily at the cell surface (Figure 8a). Exposure of the cells to EGF evoked a rapid mobilization of the receptor into cytoplasmic vesicles (Figure 8b), in agreement with previous studies (Carter and Sorkin, 1998;Bailly et al, 2000;Carpenter, 2000). In contrast, exposure of the cells to either recombinant protein did not cause any appreciable EGFR movement into the cytoplasm (Figure 8c-f).…”
Section: Lrig1 Induces Neither Egfr Internalization Nor Egfr Phosphorsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has been previously shown that this EGFR, carrying either a GFP or a CFP, is fully viable and signals in response to EGF, and has been successfully used to study EGFR endocytosis, trafficking and interaction with various adaptor proteins (Carter and Sorkin, 1998;Sorkin et al, 2000;Jiang and Sorkin, 2002;Jiang et al, 2003) and chemotactic responses (Bailly et al, 2000). Immunoblotting of total cell lysates showed the expression of a B200-kDa EGFR-CFP chimera in the CHO-K1 11A3 cells ( Figure 4c).…”
Section: Lrig1 Ectodomain Attenuates Egfr Activity S Goldoni Et Almentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Western blots, immunofluorescence and fluorescenceactivated cell sorting (FACS) confirm that MTLn3 cells express ErbB2, ErbB3 (Levea et al, 2000;Xue et al, 2006; Kedrin et al, 2009) and ErbB4 (personal communication Sumanta Goswami, Yeshiva University, and Michele Balsamo, MIT, Cambridge, MA). Previous studies have also confirmed that EGFRs in MTLn3 cells are fully active and homogenously distributed on the plasma membrane (Lichtner et al., 1992;Bailly et al, 2000). Dominant coexpression of vimentin and CK14 in MTLn3 cells suggests that these cells represent a myoepithelial or basal cell that has partially dedifferentiated (Lichtner et al, 1991).…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The EGF receptor, ErbB1 is involved in the metastatic process. Overexpression of ErbB1 can increase chemotaxis to EGF (Bailly et al, 1998;Bailly et al, 2000;Gschwind et al, 2002;Dittmar et al, 2002). Activation of ErbB2/ErbB3 heterodimers can affect both proliferation and motility (Xue et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%