2017
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-targeted Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) for the Treatment of EGFR-expressing Bladder Cancer

Abstract: The use of light as a means of therapy for bladder cancer (BC) has a long history but has been hampered by a lack of tumor specificity and therefore, damage to the normal bladder mucosa. Here, we describe a targeted form of photo-therapy called photoimmunotherapy (PIT) which targets EGFR-expressing BC. Anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (pan) was labeled with the photo-absorber (PA), IRDye 700Dx (IR700), to create a pan IR700 antibody-PA conjugate which is activated by near-infrared radiation (NIR). BC tissue micr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Membrane lipid peroxidation is responsible for inducing membrane damage in PDT, 32,33 but any oxidative changes on major unsaturated lipid molecules after NIR-PIT have not been detected so far. 5,12 Unlike conventional plasma membrane-targeted photosensitizers, an mAb-IR700 is sufficiently far away from the plasma membrane and does not induce oxidative damage because of the very short half-life of singlet oxygen. 12,34 There is a report that free radical scavengers reduced the effect of NIR-PIT, 35 although this has not been generally accepted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Membrane lipid peroxidation is responsible for inducing membrane damage in PDT, 32,33 but any oxidative changes on major unsaturated lipid molecules after NIR-PIT have not been detected so far. 5,12 Unlike conventional plasma membrane-targeted photosensitizers, an mAb-IR700 is sufficiently far away from the plasma membrane and does not induce oxidative damage because of the very short half-life of singlet oxygen. 12,34 There is a report that free radical scavengers reduced the effect of NIR-PIT, 35 although this has not been generally accepted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,12 Unlike conventional plasma membrane-targeted photosensitizers, an mAb-IR700 is sufficiently far away from the plasma membrane and does not induce oxidative damage because of the very short half-life of singlet oxygen. 12,34 There is a report that free radical scavengers reduced the effect of NIR-PIT, 35 although this has not been generally accepted. 5,11 The molecular mechanism causing such minute plasma membrane damage in NIR-PIT remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The feasibility and safety of PDT using the photosensitizers HAL or Radiochlorine have been tested in small clinical trials (8,9). Because of lack of specificity of the photosensitizer, long irradiation times, and significant local side effects, PDT has not been widely adopted clinically for bladder cancer (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike several other techniques used for measuring protein-protein interaction, this approach does not require sophisticated instrumentation or purified EGFR, and assesses the binding of antibody to EGFR on acell surface.T he technique is similar to whole cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and on-cell western used for quantification of cell surface antigens. [25] As eries of control experiments were performed to demonstrate the viability of the on-cell assay used in this study.W hen7 D12 was incubated with MDA-MB-231, ac ell line with low levels of EGFR, often used as an egative control, [24] the chemiluminescence signal was significantly lower compared to the signal for A431 cancer cell line ( Figure S6). This supports our premise that the observed chemiluminescence is due to specific interaction between 7D12 and EGFR, and not due to non-specific binding of 7D12 to the cell surface.W ea lso measured the binding of an unrelated His6-tagged antibody fragment, RR6-VHH, [26] to A431 cells using this assay.N ear-background level of chemiluminescence was observed with RR6-VHH, demonstrating that the observed signal is not due to the non-specific interaction of antibody fragments with A431 cancer cells ( Figure S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%