2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00881-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidural cerebellar stimulation drives widespread neural synchrony in the intact and stroke perilesional cortex

Abstract: Background Cerebellar electrical stimulation has shown promise in improving motor recovery post-stroke in both rodent and human studies. Past studies have used motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to evaluate how cerebellar stimulation modulates ongoing activity in the cortex, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. Here we used invasive electrophysiological recordings from the intact and stroke-injured rodent primary motor cortex (M1) to assess how epidural cerebellar stimulation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work also boosted M1 LFOs through electric stimulation to promote recovery. Recently, there has also been an interest in cerebellar stimulation for stroke recovery ( Machado et al, 2009 ; Shah et al, 2017 ; Abbasi et al, 2021 ), but a biomarker in cortico-cerebellar networks that can be a target for closed-loop electric stimulation for stroke recovery is lacking. Future work can test whether the LFOs we found in cortico-cerebellar networks of healthy animals with skill consolidation here can also serve as a biomarker for motor function during recovery from stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work also boosted M1 LFOs through electric stimulation to promote recovery. Recently, there has also been an interest in cerebellar stimulation for stroke recovery ( Machado et al, 2009 ; Shah et al, 2017 ; Abbasi et al, 2021 ), but a biomarker in cortico-cerebellar networks that can be a target for closed-loop electric stimulation for stroke recovery is lacking. Future work can test whether the LFOs we found in cortico-cerebellar networks of healthy animals with skill consolidation here can also serve as a biomarker for motor function during recovery from stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work also boosted M1 LFOs through electric stimulation to promote recovery. Recently, there has also been an interest in cerebellar stimulation for stroke recovery [58][59][60] , but a biomarker in corticocerebellar networks that can be target for closed-loop electric stimulation for stroke recovery is lacking. Future work can test if the LFOs we found in cortico-cerebellar networks of healthy animals with skill consolidation here can also serve as a biomarker for motor function during recovery from stroke.…”
Section: Coordinated Oscillatory Dynamics Across Motor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that the structure of the middle cerebral artery in SD rats highly varies from one rat to another [ 21 , 32 ]. Nevertheless, previous studies on the FCI model using Long–Evans (LE) rats do not show any deviation or variability related to this rat strain [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. We therefore chose to induce the ischemic stroke specifically in LE rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%