SUMMARYWhat is known and objective: Based on in vitro assays and select animal models, buprenorphine is commonly called a 'partial agonist'. An implication is that it should produce less analgesic effect in humans than so-called 'full agonists' such as morphine or fentanyl. However, buprenorphine has a multimechanistic pharmacology, and thus partial agonism at a specific receptor is not particularly relevant to its overall analgesic action. We review published clinical trials that directly compared the magnitude of buprenorphine's analgesic effect to analgesics commonly considered full agonists. Comment: Due to different signal transduction pathways, a drug can be a full agonist on one endpoint and a partial agonist on another. Therefore, we limited the present review to buprenorphine's analgesic effect. What is new and conclusion: Twenty-four controlled clinical trials were identified, plus a case report and dose-response curve. Based on complete or comparable pain relief, in buprenorphine had full clinical analgesic efficacy in 25 of the 26 studies.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVEBuprenorphine is a centrally acting analgesic. It was first synthesized in 1966 and has been demonstrated to have antinociceptive and analgesic activity 1,2 against a wide variety of pains, including nociceptive, musculoskeletal, neuropathic and cancer-related 3 pains. Buprenorphine's oral absorption is limited, but its bioavailability is greater by other routes, and its physiochemical properties make it particularly well suited for use in transdermal 'patch' formulations. 4 Buprenorphine's mechanism of action has previously been described 5-8 as has its clinical characteristics that warrant its consideration as a first-line analgesic.9 However, the basis for its classification as a 'partial agonist' has undergone much less scrutiny. We focus on the single issue of whether buprenorphine produces the same or different clinical analgesic efficacy as analgesics considered to be full agonists.When a drug is characterized as a 'full' or 'partial' agonist based primarily on in vitro assays, it can confuse the related, but distinct, pharmacologic principles of affinity and intrinsic activity (properties at the receptor level) and efficacy (manifested at a particular endpoint). 'Affinity' is the thermodynamically driven chemical attraction between a drug and a receptor 10 ; 'intrinsic activity' is the biological stimulus imparted by a drug to a receptor 11 ; and 'efficacy' relates to the level of drug-induced effect in a given application. Unfortunately, in certain contexts, the term 'efficacy' has sometimes been loosely used as if it is a fundamental property of a drug, rather than as being situation (endpoint) dependent. We use the term 'clinical efficacy' in order to be clear. As the definition of a partial agonist involves an inability to produce the same level of effect as some reference drug in a given situation, it is only meaningful in the context of a reference compound or drug. This review summarizes published comparisons of buprenorphi...