Eighty patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) were randomly allocated to three groups. Group I (n = 29) received general anaesthesia, Group II (n = 29) epidural anaesthesia and Group III (n = 22) the same epidural as Group II and the same general anaesthesia as Group I but with a lower isoflurane concentration. Prothrombin time (PT), activated thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (FG), plasminogen (PG), antithrombin III (AT III), protein C (Proc C), alpha-2-antiplasmin (alpha 2AP), Factor VIII coagulating activity (F VIII:C), von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag), von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor (vWF:Rcof), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) as antigen and activity were measured before induction (A), at the end of surgery (B), on the first postoperative morning (C) and 7 days postoperatively (D). The most relevant finding was that AT III was equally depressed immediately after surgery in all groups, but returned to normal significantly faster in the epidural group (mean values at C: 96.2% in Group I, 104.1% in Group II, 92.7% in Group III). The faster return to normal of AT III after epidural anaesthesia could be one of the mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effect of this technique on the prevention of thromboembolic complications.
The combination of low-dose sufentanil with lignocaine for subarachnoid anaesthesia was studied in a double-blind comparative trial in 40 urological patients. Patients were allocated randomly to two groups and received 5% heavy lignocaine 1.5 ml together with either 1.5 ml of sufentanil 5 micrograms ml-1, or physiological saline 1.5 ml. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to analgesia or anaesthesia. The only clear benefit of the addition of a low dose of sufentanil to lignocaine was the significantly longer period of postoperative analgesia. There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesics. Side-effects were similar in both groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.