2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961115755.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episodic heavy drinking in four Nordic countries: a comparative survey

Abstract: The relations between subjective and more objective measures of episodic heavy drinking vary considerably between the Nordic countries. The results suggest that the definition, acceptability and experience of intoxication vary even when a set of relatively homogeneous countries are compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants provided a rating on a scale from 0 “never” to 4 “daily or almost daily”. While the cutoff of 5 or more drinks is commonly used to mark heavy episodic drinking, others (e.g., Mäkelä et al, 2001) have used the cutoff of 6 or more drinks in one occasion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants provided a rating on a scale from 0 “never” to 4 “daily or almost daily”. While the cutoff of 5 or more drinks is commonly used to mark heavy episodic drinking, others (e.g., Mäkelä et al, 2001) have used the cutoff of 6 or more drinks in one occasion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same types of harm related to others' drinking were also included in a sum-score index of "nuisance from others' drinking" used in a comparative analysis of drinking habits and related harms in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) (Mäkelä et al, 1999). The authors found that cross-country variation in this nuisance index did not reflect varied consumption levels.…”
Section: Transferability Of Survey Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of harm typically addressed in survey studies of AHTO are also fairly prevalent (i.e. past year prevalence rates typically in the range from 2-3% to 20-30%)(Moan et al, 2015;Mäkelä et al, 1999;Rossow & Hauge, 2004). In most cases, these types of harm are, when they occur as single or infrequent events, likely of little or modest importance for health and social well-being (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Nordic countries, however, consuming six or more alcoholic units of one type of beverage on one drinking occasion is often used in research [1, 2]. It is also a threshold for risky drinking according to the National Institute of Health and Welfare in Finland [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%