Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits

Abstract

Epistasis-nonlinear genetic interactions between polymorphic loci-is the genetic basis of canalization and speciation, and epistatic interactions can be used to infer genetic networks affecting quantitative traits. However, the role that epistasis plays in the genetic architecture of quantitative traits is controversial. Here, we compared the genetic architecture of three Drosophila life history traits in the sequenced inbred lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and a large outbred, advanced intercross population derived from 40 DGRP lines (Flyland). We assessed allele frequency changes between pools of individuals at the extremes of the distribution for each trait in the Flyland population by deep DNA sequencing. The genetic architecture of all traits was highly polygenic in both analyses. Surprisingly, none of the SNPs associated with the traits in Flyland replicated in the DGRP and vice versa. However, the majority of these SNPs participated in at least one epistatic interaction in the DGRP. Despite apparent additive effects at largely distinct loci in the two populations, the epistatic interactions perturbed common, biologically plausible, and highly connected genetic networks. Our analysis underscores the importance of epistasis as a principal factor that determines variation for quantitative traits and provides a means to uncover genetic networks affecting these traits. Knowledge of epistatic networks will contribute to our understanding of the genetic basis of evolutionarily and clinically important traits and enhance predictive ability at an individualized level in medicine and agriculture.chill coma recovery | genetic interaction networks | genome-wide association studies | startle response | starvation resistance

The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila

“…Alternatively, part of the missing heritability may be caused by unknown loci that interact epistatically (Huang et al . 2012; Zuk et al . 2012), although the lack of epistasis among the loci we did detect suggests this may be less likely.…”

“…2014), widespread epistasis (Huang et al . 2012; Zuk et al . 2012; Mackay 2014), many very small effect loci (Yang et al .…”

Effects of larval crowding on quantitative variation for development time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster

“…A potential explanation lies in the highly polygenic nature of life‐history traits; it creates the opportunity for ample amount of nonadditive genetic variation—dominance, epistatic, and genotype‐by‐environment interactions (GEIs)—to exist. Recently, there have been studies quantifying dominance effects and epistasis (Armbruster, Bradshaw, & Holzapfel, 1997; Huang et al., 2012; Monnahan & Kelly, 2015), as well as the role of GEI in adaptation (e.g., Gutteling, Riksen, Bakker, & Kammenga, 2007; Jarosz & Lindquist, 2010; Rohner et al., 2013; for a review see Schlichting, 2008). Despite that, the pervasiveness of additive‐ and nonadditive variation—particularly for competitive traits—is still not yet well understood, especially in the context of environmental changes.…”

How consistent are the transcriptome changes associated with cold acclimation in two species of the Drosophila virilis group?

“…In contrast, quantitative genetics studies have often suggested that traits important to adaptation are polygenic, and quantitative trait loci (QTL) may have low repeatability between species (Arbuthnott, 2009;Huang et al, 2012;Rockman, 2012). One reason for this disparity may be that candidate genes are typically those that have a large influence on a particular trait, and thus the evolutionary forces affecting them are likely to be stronger and more consistent than those for smaller effect loci.…”