This paper explores the semantic motivation of postmodal
auxiliaries in complement constructions conveying mirativity in French and
Finnish. French pouvoir ‘can’ and Finnish
pitää ‘should’ both occur as postmodal markers in
complements of epistemic and axiological items. These constructions refer to
events that deviate from what is discursively projected as expected. As a
modal verb of possibility, pouvoir profiles the meaning
‘p and not ¬p’, which is based on an
opposition, while pitää, originally a necessity verb, gives
prominence to the paradigmatic meaning ’p instead of
q1, q2
…’. While the two verbs
function in a similar manner as indexes of an interclausal semantic link in
mirative constructions, the meaning of unexpectedness is not construed in
the same way, and the critical contexts in the evolution of postmodal
complement patterns with pouvoir and pitää
are of a different type.