2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic Uncertainties in Structural Modeling: A Blind Benchmark for Seismic Assessment of Slender Masonry Towers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect was investigated in detail in several literature works, with reference to structural typologies different from masonry buildings whereas, to the authors' knowledge, only very few studies analyzed the effect of modelling uncertainties on the response of masonry structures (e.g. Parisi and Augenti, 2012, Bracchi et al 2015, Bosiljkov et al 2015, Bartoli et al 2017).…”
Section: Identification Of Structural Modeling Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect was investigated in detail in several literature works, with reference to structural typologies different from masonry buildings whereas, to the authors' knowledge, only very few studies analyzed the effect of modelling uncertainties on the response of masonry structures (e.g. Parisi and Augenti, 2012, Bracchi et al 2015, Bosiljkov et al 2015, Bartoli et al 2017).…”
Section: Identification Of Structural Modeling Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e numerical modelling was carried out by using the FEM software MIDAS FEA [46] following a smeared-crack macromodelling approach in which the wall is treated as an homogeneous continuum medium. Despite the fact that cob walls could exhibit an anisotropic behaviour, an isotropic behaviour is here assumed due to the good consistency between numerical and experimental results, as it is usually done for other materials such as rammed earth [23] or masonry [47][48][49] that could exhibit anisotropic behaviour. In particular, the potentiality of the smeared-crack macromodelling approach to accurately simulate the mechanical behaviour of a rammed earth wall and to detect potential zones of failure by delamination has been recently shown in [23].…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Finite Element (FE) technique is today amongst the most diffused methods used to assess the structural behaviour in the general Computational Mechanics context and especially in the field of Civil Engineering Applications (Pepper et al, 2014). Particularly relevant, in recent years, for academic and research application projects is the open source salome_meca environment: a platform which includes the FE solver code_aster, developed since the late '80s by EDF (ElecricitĂŠ de France) and diffused under LGPL license since the beginning of the 2000s (Pieraccini et al, 2017 andBartoli et al, 2017). Two main inputs are needed to build reliably and consistently a FE Model: i) the mesh and ii) the additional information to be implemented within the finite elements (properties, loads, boundary conditions etc.).…”
Section: Fe Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%