2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitaxial CeO2 buffer layer on deliberately miscut sapphire for microcrack-free thick YBa2Cu3O7−δ films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in rms value might be due to the higher mobility of the evaporated species at high T ðCeO 2 Þ . Similar trend was observed for Df, Do, and rms roughness by the authors previously on CeO 2 on vicinal r-Al 2 O 3 [18].…”
Section: Shown Insupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in rms value might be due to the higher mobility of the evaporated species at high T ðCeO 2 Þ . Similar trend was observed for Df, Do, and rms roughness by the authors previously on CeO 2 on vicinal r-Al 2 O 3 [18].…”
Section: Shown Insupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Optimization studies on PLD grown CeO 2 buffer layer revealed that there exists a critical temperature for the growth of CeO 2 , T ðCeO 2 Þ [which is found to be 800-820 1C (in this and previous study [18])], below which the crystalline quality of CeO 2 would not be improved merely by the post-annealing. Importantly, the morphology of as-grown CeO 2 films for T ðCeO 2 Þ o820 C is comprised of longitudinal grains that are interlocked orthogonal to each other, which led to the formation of corrugated structure upon annealing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a. Minute grains were observed in the sputtering method as well as the PLD method [6]. Also, the difference of surface morphologies of CeO 2 buffer layers deposited on a tilted and a non-tilted R-Al 2 O 3 substrate could not be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Supporting Information). On the one hand this is astonishing given that the relevant Al 2 O 3 [112̅0] axis is 12% larger compared with the CeO 2 [100] axis (CeO 2 [100], 5.41 Å; Al 2 O 3 [112̅0], 4.76 Å; Al 2 O 3 [1̅101], 5.21 Å) . However, on the other hand there are many studies in the literature reporting epitaxial growth of CeO 2 on Al 2 O 3 ⟨11̅02⟩ (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%