2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitaxial growth of thick GaAs on orientation-patterned wafers for nonlinear optical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show similar crystal quality to OP-GaAs films obtained from templates with offcut (100) substrate and domain walls on (011) planes. 8,11 However, the growth rate on templates with on-axis (100) substrate was higher than expected. 8 The previous study by Bliss et al 8 shows that the thick film growth rate on OPGaAs templates fabricated using a Ge layer depends on the offcut angle of the substrate.…”
Section: N T a M I N A T I O N A C C U M U L A T E D A R O U N D T H mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results show similar crystal quality to OP-GaAs films obtained from templates with offcut (100) substrate and domain walls on (011) planes. 8,11 However, the growth rate on templates with on-axis (100) substrate was higher than expected. 8 The previous study by Bliss et al 8 shows that the thick film growth rate on OPGaAs templates fabricated using a Ge layer depends on the offcut angle of the substrate.…”
Section: N T a M I N A T I O N A C C U M U L A T E D A R O U N D T H mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…8,11 However, the growth rate on templates with on-axis (100) substrate was higher than expected. 8 The previous study by Bliss et al 8 shows that the thick film growth rate on OPGaAs templates fabricated using a Ge layer depends on the offcut angle of the substrate. The growth rate on wafers with the (100) substrate oriented 4° toward the <111>B is approximately twice the growth rate on wafers with a 2° offcut, i.e., 110 µm/hr vs. 55 µm/hr.…”
Section: N T a M I N A T I O N A C C U M U L A T E D A R O U N D T H mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations