1905
DOI: 10.1084/jem.6.4-6.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epithelioma Adamantinum

Abstract: An effort is made to include here the more important literature of the subject of this article appearing since 1884. Many cases are reported under titles that make them difficult to find. Others are not described with sufficient accuracy for their certain recognition. The description of the paradental epithelial d6bris (d~bris dpith~liaux paradentaires) and the pointing out of its probable relation to these tumors by Malassez (1) in 1885 gave to their pathology a more logical and firmer basis than it had previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1958
1958
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature is inconclusive about who first described the lesion. STEENSLAND 19 described the epithelioma adamantinum in 1905, while DREIBLADT 5 described the pseudoadenoameloblastoma in 1907. In 1915, HARBITZ 9 reported a cystic adamantoma in a 15-year-old female.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is inconclusive about who first described the lesion. STEENSLAND 19 described the epithelioma adamantinum in 1905, while DREIBLADT 5 described the pseudoadenoameloblastoma in 1907. In 1915, HARBITZ 9 reported a cystic adamantoma in a 15-year-old female.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steensland (Steensland, 1905 toom van odontogeen epitheel (Becker en Verkerk, 1975). Momenteel, ruim 35 jaar later, lijken de resten van Mallasez, het glazuurorgaan, de overblijfselen van de lamina dentalis, maar voornamelijk het gubernaculum dentis ten grondslag te liggen aan de pathogenese van een adenomatoïde odontogene tumor (Ide et al, 2011).…”
Section: Beschouwingunclassified
“…T h e v ario u s stru c tu re s im plicated in th e fo rm atio n of these tu m o rs co n sist m ainly of (1) Most a u th o rs fa v o r th e epith elial cell rests o f M olasses [41,42] in ex p lain in g th e origin of am elo b lasto m as [20,25,28,43,45,56,60,68,70], O th e r w o rkers s ta te , how ever, th a t it is th e en am el organ which gives rise to these neoplasm s. Kegel [37], am ong o th ers, does believe th a t th e in n e r ep ith elial cell lay er o f th e enam el organ should be held responsible for th e se new grow ths. Zegarelli [76], on th e c o n tra ry , suggested th a t th e e x te rn a l epith elial cell lay er of th e enam el organ should be considered as th e s tru c tu re giving rise to am eloblastom as.…”
Section: Origi IImentioning
confidence: 99%