Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance were tested for their ability to study substrate binding to the active site (AS) and to the secondary binding site (SBS) of Bacillus subtilis xylanase A separately. To this end, three enzyme variants were compared. The first was a catalytically incompetent enzyme that allows substrate binding to both the AS and SBS. In the second enzyme, binding to the SBS was impaired by site-directed mutagenesis, whereas in the third enzyme, the AS was blocked using a covalent inhibitor. Both techniques were able to show that AS and SBS have a similar binding affinity.
KeywordsIsothermal titration calorimetry; Surface plasmon resonance; Xylanase; Xylooligosaccharides; Mechanism-based inhibitor In various glycoside hydrolases, substrate molecules can bind not only to the active site (AS) 1 but also to remote sites on the surface of the catalytic module. These sites are referred to as secondary binding sites (SBSs) [1]. Several putative roles have been attributed to them, many of which are analogous to functions of carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs)
HHMI Author ManuscriptHHMI Author Manuscript HHMI Author Manuscript saccharides to the Bacillus circulans xylanase AS and SBS occurs independently, whereas binding of longer chains to both sites occurs cooperatively [4]. The binding affinity constants of short xylooligo-saccharides were similar for the AS and SBS, but the on-and off-rates of substrate binding were estimated to be at least 10-fold higher for the SBS [4]. In the study presented here, the potential of isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and SPR, two commonly used techniques quantifying binding, was explored for their ability to quantify the strength of substrate binding to the AS and SBS of the glycoside hydrolase family (GH)-11 Bacillus subtilis xylanase (XBS) separately. XBS differs only one residue from the B. circulans xylanase, and the SBSs of the two enzymes are identical [5]. The SBS plays an important role for XBS in binding and hydrolysis of polymeric substrates and in substrate targeting [6,7].In contrast to NMR-monitored titration, both ITC and SPR do not allow assessment of binding to the two sites individually in a direct way. Therefore, three enzyme variants were produced, and their purity was verified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and silver staining analogous to previous descriptions [6,7]. The first one, XBS_E172A, was a catalytically incompetent mutant that can still bind substrate to the AS and SBS [5]. A two-site binding model was used to fit the data obtained with XBS_E172A. In the second variant, XBS_E172A_AAA, catalytic activity was eliminated and binding to the SBS was also impaired by mutation of three important SBS residues: G56A, T183A, and W185A [6]. Previously, using NMR-monitored titration, Ludwiczek and coworkers [4] could not detect oligosaccharide binding to the SBS of a similar mutant enzyme in which also three important SBS residues were mutated to alanine. Because we...