2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.07735
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equality of critical parameters for percolation of Gaussian free field level-sets

Abstract: We consider level-sets of the Gaussian free field on Z d , for d ≥ 3, above a given realvalued height parameter h. As h varies, this defines a canonical percolation model with strong, algebraically decaying correlations. We prove that three natural critical parameters associated to this model, namely h * * (d), h * (d) and h(d), respectively describing a wellordered subcritical phase, the emergence of an infinite cluster, and the onset of a local uniqueness regime in the supercritical phase, actually coincide,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
93
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c) Inequalities that are very similar to the one presented in Theorem 1.1 have been previously established for models such as Random Interlacements [14], Gaussian Free Field [13] and Random Walk Loop Soup [1]. And although such results have proven themselves to be very useful in studying the underlying models [15,5,16,7,6], the techniques developed so far could not be adapted to cylinders' percolation due to the rigidity of cylinder's themselves.…”
Section: Thm:2boxdec_intromentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c) Inequalities that are very similar to the one presented in Theorem 1.1 have been previously established for models such as Random Interlacements [14], Gaussian Free Field [13] and Random Walk Loop Soup [1]. And although such results have proven themselves to be very useful in studying the underlying models [15,5,16,7,6], the techniques developed so far could not be adapted to cylinders' percolation due to the rigidity of cylinder's themselves.…”
Section: Thm:2boxdec_intromentioning
confidence: 98%
“…e) Is it true that the phase transition for percolation on the Poisson Cylinder's model is sharp? This has been established for strongly dependent percolation models such as level sets of the Gaussian Free Field [7] and Random Interlacements [8].…”
Section: Thm:2boxdec_intromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we investigate the percolation phase transition for the level-set of the Gaussian membrane model on Z d , d ≥ 5, which constitutes an example of a percolation model with strong, algebraically decaying correlations. Strongly correlated percolation models of this type have garnered considerable attention recently, with prominent examples being level-sets of the discrete Gaussian free field (GFF) [12,13,16,29,33] or the Ginzburg-Landau interface model [32], the vacant set of random interlacements [30,37,38] or random walk loop soups and their vacant sets [4,7], all in dimensions d ≥ 3. As our main result, we establish that a non-trivial percolation threshold h * (d) also exists for the level-set of the membrane model in d ≥ 5, and this level is positive in high dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been first investigated in the eighties [5,22], and following [33], a very detailed understanding of its geometric properties has emerged during recent years. In particular, [12,13] and the very recent breakthrough [16] show that the level-set of the GFF undergoes a sharp phase transition at a level h GFF and an (almost surely unique) infinite connected component exists in the upper level-set at level h if h < h GFF * (d), and is absent for h > h GFF * (d). In fact, when combined with the results of [29] and [14,31,35], one has that in the entire subcritical regime h > h GFF * (d), the connection probability in the upper level-set admits an exponential decay in d ≥ 4 with a logarithmic correction in d = 3, while in the supercritical regime h < h GFF We now describe the set-up and our results in more detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation