1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00749746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has also shown that females enjoy participating in virtual teams more than males (Berdahl & Craig, 1996;Lind, 1999;Savicki, Kelley, & Lingenfelter, 1996). Perhaps this is because it is more difficult for males to establish dominance through electronic communications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has also shown that females enjoy participating in virtual teams more than males (Berdahl & Craig, 1996;Lind, 1999;Savicki, Kelley, & Lingenfelter, 1996). Perhaps this is because it is more difficult for males to establish dominance through electronic communications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two can be varied independently in the laboratory. Kiesler and Sproull (1992) found that status differences were smaller in groups using computer-mediated communication (CMC) than in face-to-face (FTF) groups performing the same task (other studies, e.g., Berdahl & Craig, 1996, have found opposite effects; see McGrath & Hollingshead, 1994, for a review). Differences in structure based on communication technology would be expected on the basis of sociotechnical theory, which stresses the mutual adjustment and structuring of technical and social systems.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research findings regarding this proposition, continue to be inconclusive and inconsistent. CMC was found to increase participation equality relative to FTF in a majority of cases, although some research reports that CMC either had no effect on participation equality (e.g., Bresciani & Eppler, ; Hatem et al., ; Smith et al., ) or that CMC generated less participation equality relative to FTF (e.g., Berdahl & Craig, ; Daily & Teich, ).…”
Section: Prior Theory and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, even if names or pseudonyms are not explicitly attached to comments, participants may still have some ability to identify the author (Hayne, Pollard, & Rice, ). Although some studies have found anonymous CMC to increase participation equality (e.g., Weisband, ; Straus, ; Dennis & Garfield, ), other studies found no effect (e.g., Weisband, Schneider, & Connolly, ; Smith et al., ; Haines et al., ), or that anonymous CMC decreased participation equality (e.g., Berdahl & Craig, ; Daily & Teich, ).…”
Section: Prior Theory and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%