2020
DOI: 10.5194/ejm-32-575-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equation of state and high-pressure phase behaviour of SrCO<sub>3</sub>

Abstract: Abstract. The high-pressure phase transition of strontianite (SrCO3) was investigated at ambient temperature by means of powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The samples were compressed in a diamond anvil cell to a maximum pressure of 49 GPa. Structure refinements confirm the existence of SrCO3 in the low pressure aragonite-type phase Pmcn (62) up to about 26 GPa. Above this pressure, SrCO3 transforms into a high-pressure phase with post-aragonite crystal structure Pmmn (59). Fitting the volume extract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated equilibrium curves of aragonite and postaragonite structures of SrCO 3 and BaCO 3 were almost independent of temperature (Figure S4b and d). The pressure of the phase transition was around 17 GPa for SrCO 3 and around 7 GPa for BaCO 3 , which agreed with the available experimental results for these compounds. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The calculated equilibrium curves of aragonite and postaragonite structures of SrCO 3 and BaCO 3 were almost independent of temperature (Figure S4b and d). The pressure of the phase transition was around 17 GPa for SrCO 3 and around 7 GPa for BaCO 3 , which agreed with the available experimental results for these compounds. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The experimentally obtained bulk modulus for the Ca 0.8 Sr 0.2 CO 3 and Ca 0.5 Sr 0.5 CO 3 composition is in good agreement with the data from the DFT-based calculations. The bulk modulus obtained for the equimolar solid solution is significantly lower than expected from a linear interpolation between the end-member carbonates, strontianite ( K 0 ≈ 63 GPa) and aragonite ( K 0 ≈ 67 GPa). ,,, While Dudnikova et al predicted a decrease in the bulk modulus of ≈1 GPa for the Ca 0.5 Sr 0.5 CO 3 solid solution relative to the ideal value, we experimentally determined a difference of ≈10 GPa. This clearly shows the limitations of the force field used by Dudnikova et al…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…These experimental results compare well with those obtained from theoretical calculations: V 0 = 1608.0(1) Å 3 , B 0 = 64.25(4) GPa, and B 0 ′ = 3.99(1). The bulk modulus lies in between those of the two end-member carbonates: 67(2) GPa for CaCO 3 calcite, 66.5(7) GPa ( B ′ 0 = 5.0(1)) for CaCO 3 aragonite and 48(1) GPa for BaCO 3 witherite, and it is comparable to the 62.7(6) GPa of SrCO 3 strontianite. , In other words, our data evidences that BaCa­(CO 3 ) 2 alstonite is more compressible than all of the divalent metal carbonates and silicate-carbonates except witherite. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The bulk modulus lies in between those of the two end-member carbonates: 67(2) GPa for CaCO 3 calcite, 49 66.5( 7) GPa (B′ 0 = 5.0(1)) for CaCO 3 aragonite 50 and 48(1) GPa for BaCO 3 witherite, 51 and it is comparable to the 62.7(6) GPa of SrCO 3 strontianite. 51,52 In other words, our data evidences that BaCa(CO 3 ) 2 alstonite is more compressible than all of the divalent metal carbonates and silicate-carbonates except witherite. 12,48,52−54 Taking into account the good agreement found between experimental and theoretical data in (i) lattice parameters and atomic positions at ambient conditions (see Tables 2 and 3) and (ii) the unit-cell compressibility behavior within the 0−9 GPa pressure range, we use data from our DFT simulations to study the variation of bond distances and polyhedral compressibilities with pressure.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%