2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equation of State and Progenitor Dependence of Stellar-mass Black Hole Formation

Abstract: The core collapse of a massive star results in the formation of a proto-neutron star (PNS). If enough material is accreted onto a PNS, it will become gravitationally unstable and further collapse into a black hole (BH). We perform a systematic study of failing core-collapse supernovae in spherical symmetry for a wide range of pre-supernova progenitor stars and equations of state (EOSs) of nuclear matter. We analyze how variations in progenitor structure and the EOS of dense matter above nuclear saturation dens… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent systematic studies in spherical symmetry have explored the dependencies of various progenitor models and nuclear equations of state (EOSs) on the explodability and the remnant properties such as newly born BH masses (e.g. O'Connor & Ott 2011; Ugliano et al 2012;Sukhbold et al 2016;Ebinger et al 2019;da Silva Schneider et al 2020;Warren et al 2020). Pan et al (2018) performed two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric core-collapse simulations for a BH-forming progenitor with various EOSs to investigate the impacts of EOSs on the BH formation as well as on the GW and neutrino emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent systematic studies in spherical symmetry have explored the dependencies of various progenitor models and nuclear equations of state (EOSs) on the explodability and the remnant properties such as newly born BH masses (e.g. O'Connor & Ott 2011; Ugliano et al 2012;Sukhbold et al 2016;Ebinger et al 2019;da Silva Schneider et al 2020;Warren et al 2020). Pan et al (2018) performed two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric core-collapse simulations for a BH-forming progenitor with various EOSs to investigate the impacts of EOSs on the BH formation as well as on the GW and neutrino emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such scenario arises in the core-collapse supernova and proto-neutron star context, where a hot proto-neutron star is formed during the contraction of the supernova progenitor and subsequent gravitational detachment of the remnant from the expanding ejecta [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. A related scenario arises in the case of stellar black-hole formation when the progenitor mass is so large (typically tens of solar masses) that the formation of a stable compact object is not possible and a black hole is inevitably formed [8][9][10][11]. Finally, the binary neutron star mergers offer yet another scenario where finite temperature nuclear and hypernuclear matter play an important role [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The death of a massive star can give birth to a stellar-mass black hole (BH) if it fails to explode as a core-collapse supernova (CCSN) (Sumiyoshi et al 2006;O'Connor & Ott 2011). The process of this BH formation channel has been studied with neutrino-transport hydrodynamic simulations in great detail (Sumiyoshi et al 2007;O'Connor & Ott 2011;Kuroda et al 2018;Pan et al 2020;Walk et al 2020;Schneider et al 2020). As in a successful CCSN, the collapse of the progenitor's iron core produces a protocompact star (PCS) which rebounds due to the stiffening of the nuclear matter equation of state (EoS) just above nuclear saturation density (ρ sat 2.7×10 14 g cm −3 ) (Burrows & Vartanyan 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a failing CCSN, shock revival does not arise to unbind the stellar envelope. Thus, the PCS continu-ously grows through accretion and inevitably collapses into a BH once its mass exceeds the maximum compact star mass allowed by the EoS (Schneider et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation