2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0sm01443e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium chain exchange kinetics in block copolymer micelle solutions by dissipative particle dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
134
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
134
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in compressive modulus of SPEXA gels at the same n can be attributed to differences in diffusivity and residence time of the reactive acrylates in the micellar structures. The residence time of the acrylates in the micelles’ core was directly correlated to the effective interfacial tension between the chain ends and water (γ) [39, 40] in which γ increased with hydrophobicity of the monomers from G to D, L and C. Therefore, the residence time of the acrylates in SPELA and SPECA was higher than those of SPEDA and SPEGA which lead to the higher entrapment of reactive acrylates in the crosslinked micellar domains and faster gelation times for SPELA and SPECA (Figure 3b). The lower residence time of the acrylates in SPEGA and SPEDA led to higher diffusivity of the acrylates, slower but more uniform crosslinking throughout the solution, resulting in the higher compressive modulus of the gels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in compressive modulus of SPEXA gels at the same n can be attributed to differences in diffusivity and residence time of the reactive acrylates in the micellar structures. The residence time of the acrylates in the micelles’ core was directly correlated to the effective interfacial tension between the chain ends and water (γ) [39, 40] in which γ increased with hydrophobicity of the monomers from G to D, L and C. Therefore, the residence time of the acrylates in SPELA and SPECA was higher than those of SPEDA and SPEGA which lead to the higher entrapment of reactive acrylates in the crosslinked micellar domains and faster gelation times for SPELA and SPECA (Figure 3b). The lower residence time of the acrylates in SPEGA and SPEDA led to higher diffusivity of the acrylates, slower but more uniform crosslinking throughout the solution, resulting in the higher compressive modulus of the gels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 A single exponential decay was also observed by dissipative particle dynamics simulation 12 but, in addition to single unimer exchange, contributions from small aggregate fragmentation/merging and unequal size fusion/fission as additional kinetic mechanisms were found. In order to explain the logarithmic decay, Lund et al 4,5 discussed different mechanisms including possible effects of polydispersity but none of them finally could sufficiently explain the observed behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The identity of a nanocluster at any time t remains unchanged until more than half of its constituent molecules have left. The evolution of cluster composition with time is monitored using a molecular expulsion autocorrelation function f ( t ) 37,47 . In this function, all tH molecules in a given cluster (a cluster is defined here as an aggregate of four or more peptides) of specific size were marked as “native” at t’ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%