2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.144418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium magnetization of a quasispherical cluster of single-domain particles

Abstract: Equilibrium magnetization curve of a rigid finite-size spherical cluster of single-domain particles is investigated both numerically and analytically. The spatial distribution of particles within the cluster is random. Dipole-dipole interactions between particles are taken into account. The particles are monodisperse. It is shown, using the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation, that the magnetization of such clusters is generally lower than predicted by the classical Langevin model. In a broad range of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for noninteracting particles with the random easy-axis distribution, the initial slope of the magnetization curve does not depend on the anisotropy energy, it is always exactly the same as in the case of isotropic particles [20,21]. As for interacting uniaxial particles, our recent simulation study [22] also did not find any significant dependency between the weak-field magnetization and the anisotropy energy. The last important dimensionless parameter is the volume fraction (volume concentration) of nanoparticles inside the cluster:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for noninteracting particles with the random easy-axis distribution, the initial slope of the magnetization curve does not depend on the anisotropy energy, it is always exactly the same as in the case of isotropic particles [20,21]. As for interacting uniaxial particles, our recent simulation study [22] also did not find any significant dependency between the weak-field magnetization and the anisotropy energy. The last important dimensionless parameter is the volume fraction (volume concentration) of nanoparticles inside the cluster:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It was shown in Refs. [22,34] that MMFT is able to successfully describe the initial susceptibility of nanoparticles embedded in a solid nonmagnetic matrix. According to MMFT, the susceptibility of an ensemble of single-domain nanoparticles is given by…”
Section: Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is an indication that the superparamagnetic relaxations (i.e., Néel relaxation) of the particle moments is slowed down by dipole-dipole interactions [47][48][49][50] . The magnetic characteristics of the ensembles hence significantly depend on local the magnetostatic stray fields felt by the clustered nanoparticles [51][52][53][54] and reflects the subtle interplay between dipolar interactions, local magnetic anisotropy and sample homogeneity 55 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that R 1 (0, σ) = R(σ), and the function A k (σ) coincides with the corresponding value introduced by Raikher and Shliomis. 54 For magnetically soft particles, A k (0) = 1, and then eqn (35) and (37) coincide with (26). The limit of magnetically hard particles (σ → ∞) gives A k → 3 and the largest value of the initial magnetic susceptibility, χ k → 3χ L (1 + χ L ).…”
Section: Parallel Texturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] The effects of interactions between magnetic nanoparticles have been investigated experimentally [30][31][32] and in computer simulations. [33][34][35][36][37] The links between the basic magnetic propertiessuch as the dynamic magnetic susceptibility spectrumand power dissipation 38 have been explored in the context of medical applications, such as hyperthermia treatments. [39][40][41] The effects of the carrier liquid on heat dissipation have also been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%