1977
DOI: 10.1029/ja082i019p02801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium structure of equatorially mirroring radiation belt protons

Abstract: The average quiet time structure of energetic radiation belt protons can be explained as an equilibrium balance among radial diffusive transport from a proton source located just within the first closed field lines, losses due to Coulomb collisions, and charge exchange with the ambient neutral hydrogen geocorona. The mode of transport is diffusion due to substorm‐associated fluctuations in the large‐scale electric and magnetic fields. Attention is restricted to equatorially mirroring protons, and comparison is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work was done in the same way as for electrons (e.g., Newkirk and Walt, 1968;Lanzerotti et al, 1970;Tomassian et al, 1972;West et al, 1981;Chiu et al, 1990;Brautigam and Albert, 2000;Brautigam et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2016), protons and other ions/nuclei (e.g., Spjeldvik, 1977;Fritz and Spjeldvik, 1981;Jentsch, 1981;Westphalen and Spjeldvik, 1982;Panasyuk, 2004;Alinejad and Armstrong, 2006;Selesnick et al, 2016). The values of D LL obtained by this method differ from each other by 2 and more orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was done in the same way as for electrons (e.g., Newkirk and Walt, 1968;Lanzerotti et al, 1970;Tomassian et al, 1972;West et al, 1981;Chiu et al, 1990;Brautigam and Albert, 2000;Brautigam et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2016), protons and other ions/nuclei (e.g., Spjeldvik, 1977;Fritz and Spjeldvik, 1981;Jentsch, 1981;Westphalen and Spjeldvik, 1982;Panasyuk, 2004;Alinejad and Armstrong, 2006;Selesnick et al, 2016). The values of D LL obtained by this method differ from each other by 2 and more orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Diffusion of geomagnetically trapped particles has been studied by Nakada and Mead [1965], Falthammar [1966, Haerendel [1968Haerendel [ , 1970, Birmingham et al [1968], Roederer [1968aRoederer [ , 1968b, Walt [1970], Williams [1970], Cornwall [1972], Croley et al [1976], Spjeldvik [1977], Holzworth and Mozer [1979], Westphalen and Spjeldvik [1982], Jentsch [1984], Riley and Wolf [1992], Lui [1993], and Sheldon [1994]. Falthammar [1966] applied the one-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation to particles moving near the equatorial plane and found two different results for the diffusion coefficient depending on the assumed characteristics of the magnetic impulses compared to the azimuthal drift period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For randomly repeated pulses with very short rise time and very long duration, the result was D / r 10 , and for pulses not much longer than the drift period the result was D / m 2 r 6 . Spjeldvik [1977] worked on a numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation by imposing boundary conditions to explain the equilibrium structure of equatorial radiation belt protons and compared the results with observations. The steady state transport equation at an arbitrary pitch angle has been used by Jentsch [1984] to study the radial distribution of radiation belt protons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution to the Coulomb losses of protons of the radiation belts make the cold plasma electrons (Tverskoy, 1964(Tverskoy, , 1965(Tverskoy, , 1968(Tverskoy, , 1969Nakada and Mead, 1965;Schulz and Lanzerotti, 1974;Spjeldvik, 1977, Jentsch, 1984, the density of which, N e , is strongly dependent on L (see Fig. 5).…”
Section: The Coulomb Losses Of Protonsmentioning
confidence: 99%