2018
DOI: 10.1017/jsl.2017.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence Relations Invariant Under Group Actions

Abstract: We extend some recent results about bounded invariant equivalence relations and invariant subgroups of definable groups: we show that type-definability and smoothness are equivalent conditions in a wider class of relations than heretofore considered, which includes all the cases for which the equivalence was proved before.As a by-product, we show some analogous results in purely topological context (without direct use of model theory).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that after this paper was submitted, the third author made some further progress [Rze17]. In the current paper, the equivalence of smoothness and type-definability for bounded, invariant equivalence relations defined on the set of realizations of a single complete type over ∅ is proved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that after this paper was submitted, the third author made some further progress [Rze17]. In the current paper, the equivalence of smoothness and type-definability for bounded, invariant equivalence relations defined on the set of realizations of a single complete type over ∅ is proved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Example 4.4 of [KR16] shows that even under this assumption, in general, smoothness does not imply type-definability. In [Rze17], the third author introduced a new class of weakly orbital equivalence relations (which contains invariant relations defined on a single complete type over ∅ as well as orbital relations, such as E L , considered on the whole monster model), and proved that for such relations smoothness implies type-definability. This result generalizes Theorem 4.1, but one should emphasize that the proof of this generalization uses Theorem 4.1 and does not yield a new proof of Theorem 4.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See also [Rze16,Corollary 4.10] for a generalization of Fact 1.1 to a certain class of strong types not necessarily defined on a single p(C). )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%