1997
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.51.1.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence Reliability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM®) Administration Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In other studies, interrater reliability had been confirmed for WeeFIM with Pearson's correlation coefficients and excellent agreement was indicated by Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Ͼ0.75. [13][14][15][16][17] Our study demonstrated good interrater reliability with ICC Ͼ0.98 and weighted kappas () of 0.92. We chose direct face-to-face interview with the mother as the usefulness of information collected by clinical interview had demonstrated good agreement when WeeFIM was administered either by direct observation or by interview with a parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 In other studies, interrater reliability had been confirmed for WeeFIM with Pearson's correlation coefficients and excellent agreement was indicated by Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Ͼ0.75. [13][14][15][16][17] Our study demonstrated good interrater reliability with ICC Ͼ0.98 and weighted kappas () of 0.92. We chose direct face-to-face interview with the mother as the usefulness of information collected by clinical interview had demonstrated good agreement when WeeFIM was administered either by direct observation or by interview with a parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We chose direct face-to-face interview with the mother as the usefulness of information collected by clinical interview had demonstrated good agreement when WeeFIM was administered either by direct observation or by interview with a parent. 17 Interestingly, Chinese children in Hong Kong scored better than the American counterparts in domain 1 (self-care) in all ages. This might be attributable to early attendance in preschool settings where children are taught to tend to their needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total WeeFIM score ranges between a minimum of 18 points (completely dependent in all activities) and a maximum of 126 points (completely independent in all activities). Its reliability and validity have been previously shown in children with SB patients and healthy children (10,11,13,14).…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are few assessment methods available to evaluate functional status and QoL in these children. One of these measures is the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), which was generated from the adult FIM, and it is frequently used in order to assess the functional status of pediatric patients (10,11). Another measure that is used to evaluate the QoL of these patients is the Child Health Questionnaire PF-50 (CHQPF-50) scale (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%