2002
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2002.802400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent circuit analysis of an RF integrated ferromagnetic inductor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inductor is most likely an RLC circuit. C is a distributed capacitance and corresponds to the capacitance at the conductor/substrate interface and also the capacitance between coils [10]. The previous results remain valid so far the operating range remains within a reasonable frequency band (typically here o2.5 GHz).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The inductor is most likely an RLC circuit. C is a distributed capacitance and corresponds to the capacitance at the conductor/substrate interface and also the capacitance between coils [10]. The previous results remain valid so far the operating range remains within a reasonable frequency band (typically here o2.5 GHz).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We first use a two-port equivalent circuit model, 8,9 as shown in Fig. 2͑a͒, in which the physical parameters associated with the inductor structure can be extracted from the measurement.…”
Section: Equivalent Circuit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a very thin ferromagnetic layer was placed into the core of inductor for increasing its inductance value [6], with the inconvenience that the FMR frequency is usually limited to 1 GHz [6–9]. Next, modified geometries of the ferromagnetic layer were proposed to increase the shape anisotropy field, hence the FMR frequency, and reduce simultaneously the cross‐section accessible to eddy currents: slotted [7] or wire/strip patterned [8, 10] ferromagnetic films, micro/nano patterned ferromagnetic cores [9], or nanocomposite cores made of Ni‐supported nanoporous alumina membrane [11]. In these topologies, the low amount of ferromagnetic material required to avoid eddy currents together with the attempt to increase the FMR frequency prevents an important increase of permeability [12], hence of the inductance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%