2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2012.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent dynamic infinite element for soil–structure interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the MSLM material parameters have no physical meaning, because in complex structures a local spring stiffness is not measurable. Su and Wang coupled FEs with infinite elements to model plates of virtually infinite lengths and avoid reflection from boundaries [240]. Düster and Parvzian [69,192] introduced the finite cell method (FCM) and several extensions were presented by Schillinger et al [220].…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MSLM material parameters have no physical meaning, because in complex structures a local spring stiffness is not measurable. Su and Wang coupled FEs with infinite elements to model plates of virtually infinite lengths and avoid reflection from boundaries [240]. Düster and Parvzian [69,192] introduced the finite cell method (FCM) and several extensions were presented by Schillinger et al [220].…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative would be to augment the absorbing boundary condition with boundary springs or quasi-static infinite elements, such as in [89] or [95].…”
Section: The Modified Bielak Methods -Gravitational Preload and Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of Infinite Elements to timedependent problems is typically performed in the frequency domain, producing solutions in terms of Hankel functions similar in many respects to the thin layer method, [92], [93], [94], and also requiring inverse transforms to produce a time-domain solution. Su and coworkers [95] have recently proposed a formulation where the static response of the infinite elements and the dynamic response of absorbing boundary conditions of the LK type are combined, in order to avoid the inverse transforms in the time domain required for the standard infinite element approach.…”
Section: Figure 39 -Performance Of Various Simple Absorbing Boundary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damgaard et al [6], Lombardi et al [7], Bhattacharya et al [8] present various analyses for different types of projects where the importance of considering soil-structure interaction for the structural models studied was pointed out. Su and Wang [9] present a finite element model for a study with equivalent dynamic load considering the soilstructure interaction and Papadopoulos et al [10] present in their study the determination of the modal characteristics of structures considering the soil-structure interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%