2021
DOI: 10.2749/ghent.2021.1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent nosing force for a steel railway bridge based on in situ measurements

Abstract: <p>The weight and design speed of the railway vehicles increases in time. As a result, the values of design loads grow up. In old Bulgarian standard [1] the equivalent nosing force is prescribed as 60kN. In the present EN1991-2 [2] this value is 100kN. Meanwhile, a significant part of the very old bridges is not designed for nosing forces. In cases of long span between cross girders of the “open type” deck and lack of nosing braces, the load bearing capacity of longitudinal girders, concerning out of pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, previous research performed on the assessment of nosing load applied to bridges is very limited and needs to be more focused by engineers or researchers as it can significantly impact bridge maintenance costs in railway organizations. Georgiev et al (Georgiev et al 2021) investigated the nosing load applied by some trains to a steel transom top bridge in Bulgaria and compared the stresses obtained from the field testing with the stresses obtained from a simple grillage model. They did not validate their grillage model but only used that model as a baseline to estimate the design stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, previous research performed on the assessment of nosing load applied to bridges is very limited and needs to be more focused by engineers or researchers as it can significantly impact bridge maintenance costs in railway organizations. Georgiev et al (Georgiev et al 2021) investigated the nosing load applied by some trains to a steel transom top bridge in Bulgaria and compared the stresses obtained from the field testing with the stresses obtained from a simple grillage model. They did not validate their grillage model but only used that model as a baseline to estimate the design stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%