Abstract:We study equivariant coarse homology theories through an axiomatic framework. To this end we introduce the category of equivariant bornological coarse spaces and construct the universal equivariant coarse homology theory with values in the category of equivariant coarse motivic spectra.As examples of equivariant coarse homology theories we discuss equivariant coarse ordinary homology and equivariant coarse algebraic K-homology.Moreover, we discuss the cone functor, its relation with equivariant homology theori… Show more
“…Many examples of equivariant coarse homology theories are strongly additive. The following has been shown in [BEKW17]. The arguments of the present paper use a weaker form of additivity we will now introduce.…”
Section: Weak Additivitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We set I j := I \ {j}. Then (X j , free iāI j X i ) is a coarsely excisive decomposition (see [BEKW17,Def. 4.12]) of free iāI X i .…”
Section: Weak Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2]. In [BEKW17,Sec. 3 & 4] we introduced the notion of an equivariant coarse homology theory and constructed the universal equivariant coarse homology theory Yo s : GBornCoarse ā GSpX whose target is the presentable stable ā-category of equivariant coarse motivic spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To every G-bornological coarse space X one can functorially associate the motivic forgetcontrol map Ī² X : F ā (X) ā Ī£F 0 (X) (1.1) which is a morphism in GSpX (see [BEKW17,Def. 11.10] and (1.3) below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that X is the group G with the canonical bornological coarse structure and the action by left multiplication (we often denote this object by G can,min ), the forget-control map is closely related to the assembly map which appears in Farrell-Jones type conjectures, see [BEKW17,Sec. 11.2] for details.…”
Using the language of coarse homology theories, we provide an axiomatic account of vanishing results for the fibres of forget-control maps associated to spaces with equivariant finite decomposition complexity. *
“…Many examples of equivariant coarse homology theories are strongly additive. The following has been shown in [BEKW17]. The arguments of the present paper use a weaker form of additivity we will now introduce.…”
Section: Weak Additivitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We set I j := I \ {j}. Then (X j , free iāI j X i ) is a coarsely excisive decomposition (see [BEKW17,Def. 4.12]) of free iāI X i .…”
Section: Weak Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2]. In [BEKW17,Sec. 3 & 4] we introduced the notion of an equivariant coarse homology theory and constructed the universal equivariant coarse homology theory Yo s : GBornCoarse ā GSpX whose target is the presentable stable ā-category of equivariant coarse motivic spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To every G-bornological coarse space X one can functorially associate the motivic forgetcontrol map Ī² X : F ā (X) ā Ī£F 0 (X) (1.1) which is a morphism in GSpX (see [BEKW17,Def. 11.10] and (1.3) below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that X is the group G with the canonical bornological coarse structure and the action by left multiplication (we often denote this object by G can,min ), the forget-control map is closely related to the assembly map which appears in Farrell-Jones type conjectures, see [BEKW17,Sec. 11.2] for details.…”
Using the language of coarse homology theories, we provide an axiomatic account of vanishing results for the fibres of forget-control maps associated to spaces with equivariant finite decomposition complexity. *
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsācitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.