“…In analogy to the first part of Lemma 4.12 we shall now prove the following theorem, which says that the external and slant products which we have constructed are compatible in the sense that (x × z)/θ = x × (z/θ). It would also be nice to have an analogue of the second part of Lemma 4.12, but this would require the construction of a secondary (16) external product of the form…”
Section: Composing Slant With External Productsmentioning
Les Annales de l'institut Fourier sont membres du Centre Mersenne pour l'édition scienti que ouverte www.centre-mersenne.org Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble Article à paraître Mis en ligne le 7 juin 2021.
“…In analogy to the first part of Lemma 4.12 we shall now prove the following theorem, which says that the external and slant products which we have constructed are compatible in the sense that (x × z)/θ = x × (z/θ). It would also be nice to have an analogue of the second part of Lemma 4.12, but this would require the construction of a secondary (16) external product of the form…”
Section: Composing Slant With External Productsmentioning
Les Annales de l'institut Fourier sont membres du Centre Mersenne pour l'édition scienti que ouverte www.centre-mersenne.org Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble Article à paraître Mis en ligne le 7 juin 2021.
“…Dual to the ordinary coarse cohomology, there is also an ordinary coarse homology HX * (−, −; M). In a special case, its definition has already been given in [23, page 453], and the general version was developed in [3,Section 6.3]. We refer to [21,Section 4.1] for proofs of basic properties, including that it is a coarse homology theory satisfying the strong excision axiom.…”
Section: Secondary Cup and Cap Products On Ordinary Coarse (Co-)homologymentioning
We construct secondary cup and cap products on coarse (co-)homology theories from given cross and slant products. They are defined for coarse spaces relative to weak generalized controlled deformation retracts. On ordinary coarse cohomology, our secondary cup product agrees with a secondary product defined by Roe. For coarsifications of topological coarse (co-)homology theories, our secondary cup and cap products correspond to the primary cup and cap products on Higson dominated coronas via transgression maps. And in the case of coarse $$\mathrm {K}$$
K
-theory and -homology, the secondary products correspond to canonical primary products between the $$\mathrm {K}$$
K
-theories of the stable Higson corona and the Roe algebra under assembly and co-assembly.
“…We further recall the notion of an equivariant coarse homology theory, in particular its universal version with values in the stable ‐category of equivariant coarse motivic spectra. Most of this material has been developed in [13] (see also [10] for the nonequivariant case).…”
Section: G‐bornological Coarse Spaces and Coarse Homology Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark In [10] we called this property strongly bounded geometry . It is not invariant under coarse equivalences.…”
Section: Assembly and Forget‐control Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture the large‐scale geometry of metric spaces like (with its word metric), we introduced the category of ‐bornological coarse spaces in [10, 13]. We further defined the notion of an equivariant coarse homology theory.…”
We show injectivity results for assembly maps using equivariant coarse homology theories with transfers. Our method is based on the descent principle and applies to a large class of linear groups or, more generally, groups with finite decomposition complexity. Contents
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.