Erfassung akzeptanzrelevanter Merkmale von Datenbrillen mittels Repertory Grid Technik

Grauel, Britta; Terhoeven, Jan; Wischniewski, Sascha; Kluge, Annette

doi:10.1007/bf03373926

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secondly, the results showed that HMT-1 contains functionalities that both support and hinder the workflow. These results are consistent with the results of the study reported by [8]. Therefore, as with any technology, when introducing the technology into an organization, it is necessary to invest time in considering appropriate work tasks in order to benefit from the technology.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Previous research on user acceptance of HMDs has revealed differences in acceptance between usage scenarios [13] and differences in technology properties [8]. For instance, [13] analysed augmented reality smart glasses and their role in work assistance in electronics manufacturing in two use cases (order picking in warehouse logistics and assembly machine setup).…”

Section: Head-mounted Devices For Cognitive Assistancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cognitive Assistance to Support Maintenance and Assembly Tasks: Results on Technology Acceptance of a Head-Mounted Device

Gerdenitsch¹,

Deinhard²,

Kern³

et al. 2021

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a study investigating the user acceptance (i.e. the perceived ease of use, willingness to use the system over time, and perceived usefulness) of a smart head-mounted device that can be used as assistive technology for maintenance and assembly. In particular, we focus on the head-mounted display named HMT-1 from RealWear. The uniqueness of this technology is, among other things, that it offers the possibility to fold away the display with the instructions, allowing more control over the appearance of assistive content than in other head-mounted displays. Overall, 48 participants took part in this interview study. They mentioned some advantages (e.g., that the hands are free and that one can see the instructions while working on something else at the same time) and disadvantages of the technology (such as usability issues). They also suggested that the technology is suitable for non-routine tasks and tasks of medium-to-high complexity. Our findings highlight that a cognitive assistive technology is perceived as positive when direct assistance is available (in the visual field of the worker) with a possibility to control the system.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Head-mounted Devices For Cognitive Assistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Assistance to Support Maintenance and Assembly Tasks: Results on Technology Acceptance of a Head-Mounted Device

Gerdenitsch¹,

Deinhard²,

Kern³

et al. 2021

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although laptops or smart glasses also are mobile computing technology, these were excluded because of the specifically different handling. Extensive research on physical strain while using head-mounted displays and smart glasses can be found, for example, in [10,11], or [12].…”

Section: Literature Search/methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review on smart mobile devices and physical strain

Tegtmeier

2018

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reviewed literature indicated an elevated biomechanical risk, especially for the neck, the wrists and thumb. This was due to poor posture, ongoing and intermitted muscle tension, and/or repetitive movements. Papers addressing specific risks for smartphone and tablet use in different work environments are scarce. As the technology, as well as the use of smart mobile devices is rapidly changing, further research, especially for prolonged periods in the workplace is needed.

show abstract