2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00031-003-0819-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergodicity of mapping class group actions on representation varieties, II. Surfaces with boundary

Abstract: The mapping class group of a compact oriented surface of genus greater than one with boundary acts ergodically on connected components of the representation moduli corresponding to a connected compact Lie group, for every choice of conjugacy class boundary condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ergodicity of the MCG-action on X C (SU(2)) was proved in [2,4]. See [10,9] for similar results when G is a general compact group. Here we prove the following ergodicity result: Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The ergodicity of the MCG-action on X C (SU(2)) was proved in [2,4]. See [10,9] for similar results when G is a general compact group. Here we prove the following ergodicity result: Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The first ingredient is the ergodicity of Mod(S) on the components Rep(π, G) τ as in [17,46,47,25]. Indeed, as noted in [17], the formal property Hom(π, G × G) = Hom(π, G) × Hom(π, G), The proof crucially uses the multiplier criterion for weak mixing, as in in Glasner-Weiss [15]: the diagonal action on a Cartesian product of any ergodic probability space with a weakly mixing probability space is ergodic.…”
Section: Connected Components Of Representation Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By work of Goldman [Gol07,Gol97], Gelander [Gel08], the action of Aut(F n ) on Hom(F n , G) and the action of Out(F n ) on Hom(F n , G)/G are both ergodic for n ≥ 3. Furthermore, Pickrell and Xia [PX02,PX03], based on Goldman's results, showed that the action of Γ on M is ergodic when Σ is closed. When Σ has boundary, the mapping class group preserves the subsets of M defined by requiring a representation ̺ : π 1 (Σ) → G to map each boundary component into a prescribed conjugacy class in G; the action of Γ on each such subset is ergodic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%