2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomics factors in English as a foreign language testing: The case of PLEVALEX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In numerous territories, English language is believed the most significant foreign or second language (Laborda, Magal-Royo, Rocha, & Álvarez, 2010;Sun et al, 2011). In this manner, this point is a necessary argument to expand a prospect proposition by which to encourage learners in acquiring English as foreign language (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerous territories, English language is believed the most significant foreign or second language (Laborda, Magal-Royo, Rocha, & Álvarez, 2010;Sun et al, 2011). In this manner, this point is a necessary argument to expand a prospect proposition by which to encourage learners in acquiring English as foreign language (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To know the quality of the test, meaning how valid and reliable the tests were, there were some methods used in this study. The steps were 1) ranking their scores orderly from the highest to the lowest one; 2) dividing students into two groups, the upper (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and the lower group (21-40); 3) counting the correct and incorrect answer of each number in every group; 4) formulating the level of facility index (FV) or level of difficulties and the easiness of each item (CU+CL/N). The range can be transcribed that the value that was less than 0.30 was rejected because the item was too difficult for the students, the items were accepted when the result ranged between 0.30-0.70, while the tests were rejected if the score was more than 0.70 which was considered too easy.…”
Section: Chart 1 the Psychological Effect Of The Given Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudios previos (GARCÍA LABORDA et al, 2010) ya habían apuntado que la inmensa mayoría de los profesores de inglés de Bachillerato aprueban la creación de una evaluación oral en la PAU. Los resultados de esta sección muestran que los profesores del estudio aquí descrito tienen, sin embargo, ciertas reservas en cuanto a los siguientes aspectos:…”
Section: Expresión Oralunclassified
“…En lo referente a la automatización de la prueba, son numerosos los estudios en el proyecto Paulex Universitas que han demostrado los beneficios de la posible implementación del examen de lengua extranjera asistida por ordenador dentro de la PAU (DE SIQUEIRA et al, 2010;GARCÍA LABORDA et al, 2010;GIMENO SANZ;. A juzgar por las respuestas obtenidas en este estudio, hay dos aproximaciones posibles a la cuestión.…”
Section: Interpretación De Los Datos Y Conclusionesunclassified