1978
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90810-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonovine maleate provocative test for coronary arterial spasm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 372 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the maximum dose of ergonovine maleate was restricted to 0.20 mg, since in some cases ergonovine provocation is known to induce fatal anginal attack. In accordance with the criteria of Heupler et al , 3 the provocation test was considered positive when the coronary artery showed 75% stenosis or more. Little information is available concerning the diagnostic reliability of inverted U waves during episodes of coronary spasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the maximum dose of ergonovine maleate was restricted to 0.20 mg, since in some cases ergonovine provocation is known to induce fatal anginal attack. In accordance with the criteria of Heupler et al , 3 the provocation test was considered positive when the coronary artery showed 75% stenosis or more. Little information is available concerning the diagnostic reliability of inverted U waves during episodes of coronary spasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define the role of coronary spasm in angina at rest, an attempt was made to induce anginal attacks with ergonovine maleate in the remaining 30 patients (Heupler et at .. 1978;Specchia et al .. 1976Specchia et al .. , 1978.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be administered safely via an intravenous or an intracoronary route to provoke coronary artery spasm. [2][3][4][5] We report an unusual case, in whom intracoronary administration of ergonovine produced a biphasic response: an initial dilation with low dose and a subsequent constriction with high dose, of the large epicardial coronary artery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%