2012
DOI: 10.5835/jecm.omu.29.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erken evre glottik larenks kanserinde radyoterapi sonuçları: Tek merkez deneyimi

Abstract: Erken evre glottik larenks kanseri tanısı ile küratif radyoterapi uygulanmış olgularda geriye dönük olarak tedavi sonuçlarının ve prognostik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. 1993-2010 yılları arasında kliniğimizde radyoterapi uygulanan, biyopsi ile histopatolojik olarak kanser tanısı doğrulanmış ve RT öncesi herhangi bir tedavi uygulanmamış erken evre (T1-2N0) glottik larenks kanserli 73 olgu geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Tüm olguların verileri güncellenerek hasta, tümör ve tedaviye ait parametrelerin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous reports regarding the treatment of early stage glottic cancer have evaluated some prognostic factors, i.e., tumor volume, stage, tumor kinetics including p53 status, histological differentiation, intrinsic radiosensitivity, continued smoking during and after RT and hypoxia, low hemoglobin levels, poorly differentiated tumors, dose per fraction, total dose, overall treatment time, field size, beam energy, radiation technique, and anterior commissure involvement [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. These factors were not constantly presented to have a prognostic influence by all authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous reports regarding the treatment of early stage glottic cancer have evaluated some prognostic factors, i.e., tumor volume, stage, tumor kinetics including p53 status, histological differentiation, intrinsic radiosensitivity, continued smoking during and after RT and hypoxia, low hemoglobin levels, poorly differentiated tumors, dose per fraction, total dose, overall treatment time, field size, beam energy, radiation technique, and anterior commissure involvement [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. These factors were not constantly presented to have a prognostic influence by all authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%