Process Modelling and Landform Evolution
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0009723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosional development of small scale drainage networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to the description by Favis-Mortlock et al (2000) that some rills were more 'successful' than others. This kind of discontinuity usually characterized earlier phases of rill network development (Schramm and Prinz, 1993;Helming et al, 1999), although it was also observed at the end of rainfall simulation by Bryan and Poesen (1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponds to the description by Favis-Mortlock et al (2000) that some rills were more 'successful' than others. This kind of discontinuity usually characterized earlier phases of rill network development (Schramm and Prinz, 1993;Helming et al, 1999), although it was also observed at the end of rainfall simulation by Bryan and Poesen (1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Whilst laboratory studies are conducted mostly on one rill, under field conditions rills usually create a network, which may act differently. The functioning of rill networks is reflected in the work of Favis-Mortlock et al (2000) and Helming et al (1999). Only a few experimental studies with a rainfall simulator have presented the evolution of rill systems under field conditions (Schramm and Prinz, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental rill erosion research, from both laboratory and field studies (Bryan and Poesen, 1989;Gilley et al, 1990;Huang et al, 1996;Helming et al, 1999;Brunton and Bryan, 2000;De Santisteban et al, 2005;Mancilla et al, 2005;Rejman and Brodowski, 2005), aimed to observe rill network formation (Mancilla et al, 2005), to define the critical conditions for rill initiation (Torri et al, 1987;Govers and Poesen, 1988;Slattery and Bryan, 1992;Yao et al, 2008), to study the development of rill head cut morphology (Brunton and Bryan, 2000), to estimate the main hydraulic variables (cross-section area, wetted perimeter, hydraulic radius, mean velocity, and shear stress) (Foster et al, 1984;Gilley et al, 1990;Govers, 1992;Gimenéz et al, 2004;Bruno et al, 2008) and to propose mathematical models for estimating soil loss due to rill erosion (Foster, 1982;Nearing et al, 1997;Govers et al, 2007;Bruno et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most available experimental rill research, carried out both in laboratory (Bryan and Poesen, 1989;Brunton and Bryan, 2000;Gilley et al, 1990;Huang et al, 1996;Mancilla et al, 2005) and field conditions (De Santisteban et al, 2005, Helming et al, 1999Rejman and Brodowski, 2005), was carried out using soil with different texture and natural and simulated rainfalls. The aim of this available research was to observe rill network formation (Mancilla et al, 2005), to define the initial condition for rilling (Bryan et al, 1998;Govers and Poesen, 1988;Slattery and Bryan, 1992;Torri et al, 1987), to study the development of rill head morphology (Brunton and Bryan, 2000), to estimate the main hydraulic variables (cross-section area, wetted perimeter, hydraulic radius, mean velocity, shear stress) (Foster et al, 1984;Gilley et al, 1990;Gimenéz et al, 2004;Govers, 1992) and to propose mathematical models for estimating soil loss due to rill erosion (Foster, 1982;Nearing et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%