2011
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2010.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: A hybrid genetic algorithmic approach to the maximally diverse grouping problem

Abstract: It has come to our notice that several aspects of the above paper were incorrect. The correct version of the paper is reproduced here.The maximally diverse grouping problem (MDGP) is a NP-complete problem. For such NP-complete problems, heuristics play a major role in searching for solutions. Most of the heuristics for MDGP focus on the equal group-size situation. In this paper, we develop a genetic algorithm (GA)-based hybrid heuristic to solve this problem considering not only the equal group-size situation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarded as an extension of the MDGP, the MDGP's objective is to distribute students into unique, non-overlapping groups, thereby maximizing the sum of differences between each pair of individuals within the same group [59]. As this problem has attracted significant attention, there have been extensive research initiatives and algorithmic solutions proposed to tackle the MDGP formulation [58,60,61]. However, the key limitations of the MDGP approach include challenges in scalability as the computational complexity grows exponentially with the number of objects and groups [62], and sensitivity to the quality of input data, which influences the quality of obtained solutions [62].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarded as an extension of the MDGP, the MDGP's objective is to distribute students into unique, non-overlapping groups, thereby maximizing the sum of differences between each pair of individuals within the same group [59]. As this problem has attracted significant attention, there have been extensive research initiatives and algorithmic solutions proposed to tackle the MDGP formulation [58,60,61]. However, the key limitations of the MDGP approach include challenges in scalability as the computational complexity grows exponentially with the number of objects and groups [62], and sensitivity to the quality of input data, which influences the quality of obtained solutions [62].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem belongs to the N P-hard computational complexity class, and heuristics are available to tackle it [7]. A hybrid genetic algorithm was proposed in [8]. There, the authors suggested Tabu Search combined with strategic oscillations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the swap neighborhood of y includes all solutions ȳ such that (2)-(4) are fulfilled, y i = ȳi for all items i ∈ I\{j, j ′ }, ȳj ′ = y j , and ȳj = y j ′ . These two neighborhoods are used in most of the advanced solution methods for the MDGP, including the five advanced algorithms mentioned before as well as for example Baker and Powell (2002), Chen et al (2011), Fan et al (2011), Palubeckis et al (2011), Rodriguez et al (2013), Urošević (2014), andSchulz (2023). In the paper at hand, we present a new efficient method enhancing the neighborhood decomposition (ND) method described in Lai et al (2021a) to evaluate the two neighborhoods faster than in the standard implementation which simply evaluates the entire neighborhood and the ND implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%