2014
DOI: 10.1137/140968161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Finite Element Approximation of the Cahn--Hilliard--Cook Equation

Abstract: Abstract. We prove an additional result on the linearized Cahn-HilliardCook equation to fill in a gap in the main argument in our paper which was published in SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), 2407-2429. The result is a pathwise error estimate, which is proved by an application of the factorization argument for stochastic convolutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we prove that Xk converges uniformly strongly to X but with no specific rate given. The proof is in the same spirit as the proof of [, Theorem 5.4] (see also ). Lemma Let Xk be the solution of and X of .…”
Section: Error Boundsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next we prove that Xk converges uniformly strongly to X but with no specific rate given. The proof is in the same spirit as the proof of [, Theorem 5.4] (see also ). Lemma Let Xk be the solution of and X of .…”
Section: Error Boundsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We omit the details of the proof. We also note that the rate of convergence is suboptimal in terms of the regularity of the noise but a sharper (almost order k instead of k1/2) estimate is not needed for our purposes and would require and extended range for s and r in the deterministic error estimates in Lemma (compare with [, (2.2)]). Lemma Let 0trueWA(t)=0tE(ts)0.16emnormaldW(s) and 0trueWscriptAk(t)=0tEk(ts)Rk20.16emnormaldW(s) and suppose that A1/2Q1/2true∥ HS 2< and 2p1.…”
Section: Error Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is completely analogous to the proofs of [20, Proposition 5.1] and [23, Theorem 2.1], based on a discrete factorization method using the analyticity of the semigroup E and the deterministic error estimate [20] considers the stochastic Allen-Cahn equation where the semigroup in the stochastic convolution is generated by the Laplacian ∆ which has a weaker smoothing effect than in the present case, where the semigroup is generated by −∆ 2 . The proofs in [20] and [23] require that p is large, but the result is then valid for smaller p ≥ 1 as well.…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There it is required that the operator composition A γ 2 Q 1 2 for γ > 1 is Hilbert-Schmidt, while here we only require this with γ = 1. Therefore, the present work can be viewed as the (non-trivial) extension of [22,23] to a strongly convergent fully discrete scheme, still without a strong rate, but with improvements on the regularity requirement on the noise. Both here and in [22,23] the strategy is based on proving a priori moment bounds with large exponents and in higher order norms using energy arguments and bootstrapping followed by a pathwise Gronwall argument in the mild solution setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation