2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1625086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Hydrogen induced tunnel emission in Pt/(BaxSr1−x)Ti1+yO3+z/Pt thin film capacitors” [J. Appl. Phys. 89, 2873 (2001)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 However, the realization of this idea is a task with many obstacles, because it requires the fabrication of ultrathin films retaining pronounced ferroelectric properties at a thickness of only a few unit cells. Although there are several publications on the electron tunneling in ferroelectrics, [13][14][15][16][17][18] the experimental studies of the tunneling across ferroelectric barriers just started. [19][20][21] Since ferroelectricity is a collective phenomenon like superconductivity and magnetism, thin films are expected to be ferroelectric only above some minimum film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, the realization of this idea is a task with many obstacles, because it requires the fabrication of ultrathin films retaining pronounced ferroelectric properties at a thickness of only a few unit cells. Although there are several publications on the electron tunneling in ferroelectrics, [13][14][15][16][17][18] the experimental studies of the tunneling across ferroelectric barriers just started. [19][20][21] Since ferroelectricity is a collective phenomenon like superconductivity and magnetism, thin films are expected to be ferroelectric only above some minimum film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effective mass can be different from the band mass in the interface region, it is not expected that it be smaller; note also that polaron effects will only increase m*, not decrease it, and in any event the band mass m* should be used for these measurements, not the polaron mass. The same criticisms apply to Berniecki's value [40] of m* approximately equal to 1.0 m e in BST.…”
Section: Effective Masses For Carriersmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Dawber has shown that the dielectric constant of the metal electrodes must be taken as 1.0 for self-consistency in the Ku-Ullman theory (and certainly not the value of 100 used by Berniecki [40]), but that conclusion assumes that the ferroelectric is not semiconducting and hence that the interface capacitance arises entirely from the electron screening in the metal; to incorporate screening on both sides of the metal-ferroelectric interface Conway [41] uses a Helmholtz double-layer model to calculate the effective dielectric constant of 9.6 for a 0.5 nm thick double layer of semiconducting dielectric on metal electrode and 6.0 for a 0.3 nm thick double layer. In our own work we use this approach and calculate the zeta potential ζ = σd /εε 0 (6) of 0.8 eV, using a surface carrier density of σ = 2.8 × 10 18 m −2 electrons, a dielectric constant of 1300, and a Guoy screening length d of 20 nm.…”
Section: Helmholtz Double Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently it has been recognized that the understanding of this dead layer is also important for the understanding of the leakage currents. [8][9][10][11] In a two-capacitor model the contributions of interfacial layers, i , and film, B , can be separated for thickness series of thin films. This model assumes a bulk region of thickness t and permittivity B , and the two interface regions with thickness t i , which yield two capacitors of a lower permittivity i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The presence of a dead layer is an important aspect in the understanding of this behavior as it yields an inhomogeneous distribution of the electric field: a large drop within the lowinterfacial layer and a smaller one within the high-film. 8,10 Most of the models for the leakage current concur that the Pt/BST interface forms a Schottky barrier whose barrier height is an important parameter. Nevertheless, the details on the dominating mechanism are under discussion: thermionic emission, field emission, tunneling, as well as the drift diffusion in the bulk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%