2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.179901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: LandégFactors and Orbital Momentum Quenching in Semiconductor Quantum Dots [Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 026804 (2006)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
131
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
131
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The effect of envelope orbital momentum quenching was demonstrated in Ref. 5 for a spherical, unstrained InAs nanocrystal, by showing that the electron g factor approached the bare electron value of ∼ 2 much more quickly than would be expected from a parametrized bulk model based on Ref. 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…1 The effect of envelope orbital momentum quenching was demonstrated in Ref. 5 for a spherical, unstrained InAs nanocrystal, by showing that the electron g factor approached the bare electron value of ∼ 2 much more quickly than would be expected from a parametrized bulk model based on Ref. 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[22] provided bowing parameters (for E g , , γ 3 − γ 2 , E p , E v , and a c ). The g factors were determined by computing the Zeeman energy splittings in a uniform magnetic field, coupled to both the Bloch and envelope functions [23,24]. Spurious midgap states [25,26] were eliminated by including an optimized second-nearest-neighbor term [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, l -2 , l . We use hw = 55 meV, m*=0.077m0 (m0 is the free electron mass), and g =1.2, which are reasonable values considering previous experiments.6,15, [26][27][28] The shifts of the PL lines with field are mainly governed by the FD spectrum of electrons. However, since the electron Zeeman splitting is small, the PL polarization is predomi nantly determined by the hole levels, as is explained in the following.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%