2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERRATUM: “THE FRACTAL DIMENSION OF STAR-FORMING REGIONS AT DIFFERENT SPATIAL SCALES IN M33” (2010, ApJ, 720, 541)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity between the cluster mass-function and the stellar mass-function seems to originates from the self-similar structure of GMC, as was also discussed in Elmegreen (2002). From an observational perspective, the relation between the self-similar structure of GMCs and star forming regions has been suggested by (Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Elmegreen & Scalo 2004;Sánchez et al 2010). As can be seen in Figure 7, more massive clusters tend to form in densiter regions.…”
Section: The Self-similarity Between the Stellar Mass Function And Th...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The similarity between the cluster mass-function and the stellar mass-function seems to originates from the self-similar structure of GMC, as was also discussed in Elmegreen (2002). From an observational perspective, the relation between the self-similar structure of GMCs and star forming regions has been suggested by (Elmegreen & Falgarone 1996;Elmegreen & Scalo 2004;Sánchez et al 2010). As can be seen in Figure 7, more massive clusters tend to form in densiter regions.…”
Section: The Self-similarity Between the Stellar Mass Function And Th...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Several studies also explored the maximum size of the star-forming region over which star formation is physically correlated (Grasha et al 2017). Sánchez et al (2010); Grasha et al (2017); Jimena Rodríguez et al (2020) used the detected stars and clusters in selected nearby galaxies and reported a length scale between 200 to 1000 pc for such largest hierarchical structures. In this study, we used the FUV flux map to identify individual clumps or large structures in the observed image.…”
Section: Identification Of Young Star-forming Clumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) even when density fluctuations dominate, there are distinct methods for estimating the fractal dimension, D, which lead to significantly different values of a = D − 2 (Federrath et al 2009;Federrath, private communication). Sánchez et al (2010) carried out a detailed fractal analysis of M 33, and showed that the distribution of molecular gas undergoes a transition from fractal to homogeneous at scales roughly comparable to the disc scale height. This suggests that a ≈ 0 for ℓ > ∼ h. Concerning the value of b, Kim et al (2007) analysed the physical properties of atomic gas in the Large Magellanic Cloud, and found that the linewidth-size scaling relation of H i clouds is a simple power law up to scales of a few kpc.…”
Section: Role Of the Disc Scale Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%