2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2724-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: lack of immunity against rubella among Italian young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MMR vaccination has been covered by national health insurance that provides free of charge immunisation to all children aged ≤12 years, and clinical laboratory screening for rubella immunisation status using antirubella-specific IgG tests in pregnant women has been covered by the national health insurance free of charge for women visiting obstetrics clinics 17. Susceptible woman of childbearing age is indeed a priority, and public health efforts should be focused on catch-up activities in order to reduce the rate of susceptible young adults, especially for all women of childbearing age 23. Gynaecologists and general practitioners should be encouraged to propose rubella screening for women of childbearing age before they become pregnant to identify those women who lack rubella antibodies, whether acquired as the result of vaccination or a natural infection 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMR vaccination has been covered by national health insurance that provides free of charge immunisation to all children aged ≤12 years, and clinical laboratory screening for rubella immunisation status using antirubella-specific IgG tests in pregnant women has been covered by the national health insurance free of charge for women visiting obstetrics clinics 17. Susceptible woman of childbearing age is indeed a priority, and public health efforts should be focused on catch-up activities in order to reduce the rate of susceptible young adults, especially for all women of childbearing age 23. Gynaecologists and general practitioners should be encouraged to propose rubella screening for women of childbearing age before they become pregnant to identify those women who lack rubella antibodies, whether acquired as the result of vaccination or a natural infection 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2013, an average of 38 cases has been reported each year, reflecting changes in rubella epidemiology and outbreak patterns [22]. However, recent serological survey data for rubella in the Apulian population showed that a pocket of 13.3% persons aged 17-65 years still lack immunity against rubella [23].…”
Section: Epidemiology and Infection 595mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as already observed for other vaccinepreventable diseases, 18,19 the vaccination strategy based on the passive offer seems to be not enough for the achievement of the NPMCRE objective to reduce the percentage of susceptible females below 5%. 4,13 In conclusion, in Italy in 2017, the vaccine coverage for rubella in 16-years-old adolescents (born in 2001) is about 85% for the first dose and 83% for the second dose of MMR vaccine, 20 meaning that a considerable proportion of women entering to childbearing age are susceptible to rubella. It is therefore necessary to develop additional vaccination strategies that will target both Italian and recently immigrant women in order to reduce the pocket of susceptibility to rubella in young girls and WOCBA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is higher than reported in a seroepidemiological study conducted in 2011-2012. 13 The higher proportion of samples with immunity to rubella is most likely due to vaccination campaign for MMR implemented within the framework of NPMCRE 2010-2015. The impact of that vaccination campaign in Apulia region was such that coverage for MMR increased from 87.7% for the first dose and 75.9% for the second dose in 18-years old subjects (born in 1998) to 92.5% and 82.7% respectively in 16-years-old subjects (born in 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation