2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-014-9914-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Modeling Minority Stress Effects on Homelessness and Health Disparities among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

Abstract: Please note that in the first paragraph on p. 575 on this article, p values are reported incorrectly. The following is the correct text for this paragraph: Direct significant paths were found from experience of sexual orientation-related stigma to internalization of sexual orientation-related stigma (β=0.31, pG.001), having been kicked out of one's home (β=1.59, O.R.=4.90, pG.001), experiencing homelessness during the past year (β=0.65, O.R.= 1.91, p G.01), and major depressive symptoms during the past week (β… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most utilized scale to measure general internalized queer stigma was the Desire to be Heterosexual Subscale ( n = 3), followed by the Revised Homosexual Attitudes Inventory ( n = 2). Of the remaining, several were unnamed but reported as “adapted” [i.e., the measure cited in the Bruce et al ( 50 , 64 ) studies; one unnamed subscale from Puckett et al ( 69 )]. Though not an exhaustive list, additional scales utilized by only one of the remaining studies include the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory, and 2 studies created a measure of internalized general queer stigma using 3 dichotomous items ( 54 , 67 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most utilized scale to measure general internalized queer stigma was the Desire to be Heterosexual Subscale ( n = 3), followed by the Revised Homosexual Attitudes Inventory ( n = 2). Of the remaining, several were unnamed but reported as “adapted” [i.e., the measure cited in the Bruce et al ( 50 , 64 ) studies; one unnamed subscale from Puckett et al ( 69 )]. Though not an exhaustive list, additional scales utilized by only one of the remaining studies include the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory, and 2 studies created a measure of internalized general queer stigma using 3 dichotomous items ( 54 , 67 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two disagreements arose during comparison of results, but consensus among reviewers was reached through discussion and reviewing the article text together. Sixteen studies were considered good quality with a low risk of bias [score ranges of 6 to 7 points; ( 49 64 )]. Six studies were of fair quality with a moderate risk of bias [i.e., range of scores from 3 to 5.5, ( 65 – 70 )].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%