2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Optimal manufacturing batch size with rework process at a single-stage production system” [Comput. Ind. Eng. 47 (1) (2004) 77–89]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correctable fulfillment errors are related to production process errors that can be corrected through rework, but fulfillment errors differ from errors in the production context. Prior research generally assumes that the portion of defective items produced is constant with respect to the lot size (Peters et al, 1988;Zhang and Gerchak, 1990;So and Tang, 1995;Jamal et al, 2004;Eroglu and Ozdemir, 2007) or that defective items are the result of a production process that goes out of control with a fixed probability per unit produced (Porteus, 1986;Lee, 1992). In contrast, we find that the incidence of fulfillment errors decreases with order quantity (see Section 5).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Correctable fulfillment errors are related to production process errors that can be corrected through rework, but fulfillment errors differ from errors in the production context. Prior research generally assumes that the portion of defective items produced is constant with respect to the lot size (Peters et al, 1988;Zhang and Gerchak, 1990;So and Tang, 1995;Jamal et al, 2004;Eroglu and Ozdemir, 2007) or that defective items are the result of a production process that goes out of control with a fixed probability per unit produced (Porteus, 1986;Lee, 1992). In contrast, we find that the incidence of fulfillment errors decreases with order quantity (see Section 5).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…They assumed that all generated items will be inspected, the defective rate is a random variable and the reworking of defective items starts after finishing the production process. Jamal et al (2004) studied a production system generating defective products and they determined the optimum batch quantity in single-stage manufacturing system where the rework is performed under two different operational policies to optimize the total cost of system. Cárdenas-Barrón (2008) presented a simple derivation of two inventory policies of Jamal et al (2004).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamal et al (2004) studied a production system generating defective products and they determined the optimum batch quantity in single-stage manufacturing system where the rework is performed under two different operational policies to optimize the total cost of system. Cárdenas-Barrón (2008) presented a simple derivation of two inventory policies of Jamal et al (2004). Taleizadeh et al (2010a) studied an EPQ model with scraped item under multi product single machine manufacturing system.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They considered recycling from the last stage to the first stage, however they did not consider the cost of penalty for producing defective products at different stages. [2] presented an inventory model, which dealt with the optimum batch quantity in a single-stage system in which rework is done by addressing two different operational policies. Technical note by [3] was made to do corrections of the examples in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] presented an inventory model, which dealt with the optimum batch quantity in a single-stage system in which rework is done by addressing two different operational policies. Technical note by [3] was made to do corrections of the examples in [2]. [4] extended their research from a single-stage to a multi-stage production system with rework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%