Erratum to: Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings

Krueger, Alexis; Giannoni, Psiche; Shah, Valay A; Casadio, Maura; Scheidt, Robert A.

doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0281-7

Cited by 23 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Typically, the actuators used in wearable devices produce vibration at frequencies above 100 Hz, which activates the Pacinian corpuscles mechanoreceptors (Culbertson et al, 2018b ). The most common locations for applying the vibrotactile stimulation are the arm (Bark et al, 2008 ; Huisman et al, 2013 ; Krueger et al, 2017 ; Shah et al, 2018 ; Risi et al, 2019 ) and the torso (Van Erp et al, 2005 ; Lee et al, 2012 ; Ballardini et al, 2020 ). Other locations for stimulation include the hand (Jiang et al, 2009 ; Wan et al, 2016 ) and different locations on the lower limb (Chen B. et al, 2016 ; Shi et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The vibration intensity can be constant or may vary according to the event (Cobus et al, 2018 ). Continuous vibrotactile stimulation is used to convey various types of information to the users, including: (1) state feedback, encoding position and/or velocity of limbs (Ferris and Sarter, 2011 ; Krueger et al, 2017 ; Shah et al, 2018 ; Risi et al, 2019 ), (2) force feedback, encoding the amount of force exerted (Ahmaniemi, 2012 ), and (3) error feedback, encoding information regarding the goal of the task and the state of the end-effector (Wall et al, 2001 ; Cuppone et al, 2016 ; Krueger et al, 2017 ).…”

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been demonstrated that state feedback regarding the force exerted improved the accuracy of force repetition (Ahmaniemi, 2012 ). Other studies used state and/or error feedback to guide upper limb reaching movements in the absence of visual information (Krueger et al, 2017 ; Shah et al, 2018 ; Risi et al, 2019 ) and to reach accuracy levels beyond the limits of natural proprioception (Risi et al, 2019 ). Results from a meta-analysis indicated that vibrotactile feedback was effective in reducing task completion times, but neither forces nor errors were significantly reduced (Nitsch and Färber, 2012 ).…”

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Integrating Tactile Feedback Technologies Into Home-Based Telerehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for advancing the development and implementation of novel means for home-based telerehabilitation in order to enable remote assessment and training for individuals with disabling conditions in need of therapy. While somatosensory input is essential for motor function, to date, most telerehabilitation therapies and technologies focus on assessing and training motor impairments, while the somatosensorial aspect is largely neglected. The integration of tactile devices into home-based rehabilitation practice has the potential to enhance the recovery of sensorimotor impairments and to promote functional gains through practice in an enriched environment with augmented tactile feedback and haptic interactions. In the current review, we outline the clinical approaches for stimulating somatosensation in home-based telerehabilitation and review the existing technologies for conveying mechanical tactile feedback (i.e., vibration, stretch, pressure, and mid-air stimulations). We focus on tactile feedback technologies that can be integrated into home-based practice due to their relatively low cost, compact size, and lightweight. The advantages and opportunities, as well as the long-term challenges and gaps with regards to implementing these technologies into home-based telerehabilitation, are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tactile Stimulation Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating Tactile Feedback Technologies Into Home-Based Telerehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of Dual Tasking on Vibrotactile Feedback Guided Reaching – A Pilot Study

Shah

Risi

Ballardini

et al. 2018

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vibrotactile feedback (VTF) has been proposed as a non-invasive way to augment impaired or lost kinesthetic feedback in certain patient populations, thereby enhancing the real-time control of purposeful limb movements and quality of life. We used a dual tasking scenario to investigate the effects of cognitive load and short-term VTF training on VTF-guided reaching. Participants grasped the handle of a planar manipulandum with one hand and received VTF of its motion via a vibrotactile display attached to the non-moving arm. We asked participants to simultaneously perform VTF-guided reaching and a choice reaction time task both before and after training with VTF-guided reaching. Participants readily used VTF to guide goal-directed hand movements in the absence of visual feedback in the dual-task setting, even prior to training. This capability came at the cost of increased movement completion time. Short-term training on VTF-guided reaching induced significant improvements in target capture errors. Pre- and post-training comparisons of dual-task performance found training-related improvements in VTF-guided reach accuracy were resistant to dual-task interference. We found no training-related improvements in movement completion time or button press performance. These results indicate that VTF can be used to complete goal-directed reaches in a dual task situation, and that a single short bout of training sufficed for participants to begin the transition between the cognitive and associative phases of learning for the integration of VTF into the planning and ongoing control of reaching movements.

show abstract

Somatosensory deafferentation reveals lateralized roles of proprioception in feedback and adaptive feedforward control of movement and posture

Jayasinghe

Sarlegna

Scheidt

et al. 2021

Current Opinion in Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proprioception provides crucial information necessary for determining limb position and movement and plausibly also for updating internal models that might underlie the control of movement and posture. Seminal studies of upper-limb movements in individuals living with chronic, large-fiber deafferentation have provided evidence for the role of proprioceptive information in the hypothetical formation and maintenance of internal models to produce accurate motor commands. Vision also contributes to sensorimotor functions but cannot fully compensate for proprioceptive deficits. More recent work has shown that posture and movement control processes are lateralized in the brain, and that proprioception plays a fundamental role in coordinating the contributions of these processes to the control of goal-directed actions. In fact, the behavior of each limb in a deafferented individual resembles the action of a controller in isolation. Proprioception thus provides state estimates necessary for the nervous system to efficiently coordinate multiple motor control processes.

show abstract

Erratum to: Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings

Cited by 23 publications

References 2 publications

Integrating Tactile Feedback Technologies Into Home-Based Telerehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic

Integrating Tactile Feedback Technologies Into Home-Based Telerehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic

Effect of Dual Tasking on Vibrotactile Feedback Guided Reaching – A Pilot Study

Somatosensory deafferentation reveals lateralized roles of proprioception in feedback and adaptive feedforward control of movement and posture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About