Erratum To: Ukrainian Migration to the European Union

Abstract

This book was mistakenly published under a CC BY 4.0 license, but has now been made available under a CC BY-NC 2.5 license. The PDF and HTML versions of the book have been updated accordingly.

Immigrants and tuberculosis in Europe – are we prepared for outbreak?

“…Some of them travelled abroad, which is an important issue as Ukraine borders with four EU states: Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Romania. According to Fedyuk and Kindler, Ukrainian migration is the largest of all former Soviet Union countries' migration flows towards the EU [22].…”

“…This flow continues both from south to north (to France, Germany or the United Kingdom), as well as from east to west (to the 'Old Union' countries) [22]. Therefore, it should be assumed that the present situation is temporary as the immigrants from the former Soviet Union States will gradually relocate to other European countries.…”

“…Część z nich wyjechała za granicę, co jest istotnym problemem, ponieważ Ukraina graniczy z czterema państwami UE: Węgrami, Polską, Słowacją i Rumunią. Według Fedyuka i Kindlera migracja z Ukrainy do UE jest największym ruchem migracyjnym wśród krajów byłego Związku Radzieckiego [22].…”

“…(do Francji, Niemiec czy Wielkiej Brytanii), ale także ze wschodu na zachód (do krajów 'starej Unii') [22]. Dlatego należy przyjąć, że stan obecny to stan przejściowy, ponieważ imigranci z dawnych republic radzieckich z biegiem czasu będą zwiększać swoją obecność w innych krajach Unii Europejskiej.…”

Class mediations, working-class lives and labour subjectivity in post-socialist Ukraine

“…Neighbours or friends who took part in circular migration were seen as more, rather than less, disadvantaged, despite having more disposable income and furnishing their families with higher consumption. Given that in the preceding decade much of the migration for seasonal farm work in Poland, and domestic or care work in Italy, Portugal and Spain had been done by women (Fedyuk & Kindler, 2016; Górny, 2017; Hosnedlova & Stanek, 2014; Leifsen & Tymczuk, 2012), this broke with the dominant understanding of ‘proper’ familial and gender relations. The moral appraisal among workers, of women who left by women who remained, seemed important for the workers to maintain a sense of worth in their own eyes and that of their ‘appraisers’, an expression of ‘lay normativity’ (Sayer, 2005) necessary in the respondents’ eyes to stave off what could be called ‘crisis in proprietal authority’ (Skeggs, 2005).…”