IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2010.5675061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error analysis in indoors localization using ZigBee wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, an RSSI of -65 dBm corresponds to distances ranging between 5.5 and 77 m which actually covers almost the entire building. This large RSSI variability is also found in other experimental studies in industrial indoor environments [5]. It is obvious that, in such realistic environment, physical relationships cannot be applied as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Alternatively, an RSSI of -65 dBm corresponds to distances ranging between 5.5 and 77 m which actually covers almost the entire building. This large RSSI variability is also found in other experimental studies in industrial indoor environments [5]. It is obvious that, in such realistic environment, physical relationships cannot be applied as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The AOA algorithm uses a set of antenna arrays to determine the angle of the arrival signals and thus estimates the target position and orientation. The RSSI algorithm, which is discussed in this study, transforms the received signal strength into an equivalent distance between a signal sender and receiver pair and then calculates the target position by trilateration using at least two pairs of transmission devices (Azenha et al, 2010; Kim and Lee, 2006; Lee and Kim, 2014; Lin and Song, 2014; Montaser and Moselhi, 2014; Peng et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization algorithms based on RSSI signals can be conveniently implemented on a mobile robot system without the need of additional hardware. However, RSSI-based localization algorithms usually have limited localization accuracy in real applications because the interference and reflection of transmission signals and the orientation effects of the applied antenna can significantly affect the RSSI signals (Azenha et al, 2010; Graefenstein et al, 2009; Min et al, 2012). Therefore, some studies have focused on reducing the adverse effects induced by the antenna orientation (Graefenstein et al, 2009) and others, on improving the localization accuracy by employing probabilistic sensor fusion methods such as the Kalman filter (Ben Kilani et al, 2014; Derenick et al, 2011; Menegatti et al, 2009; Oliveira et al, 2014; Pathirana et al, 2005; Zhang et al, 2014), Bayesian filter (Ahn and Yu, 2007; Zhuang et al, 2008), least-squares estimation (Challa et al, 2005; Szalay and Nagy, 2013) and others (Feng et al, 2014; Lin and Song, 2014; Li and Wu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%