2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/720839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis in Measured Conductivity under Low Induction Number Approximation for Electromagnetic Methods

Abstract: We present an analysis of the error involved in the so-called low induction number approximation in the electromagnetic methods. In particular, we focus on the EM34 equipment settings and field configurations, widely used for geophysical prospecting of laterally electrical conductivity anomalies and shallow targets. We show the theoretical error for the conductivity in both vertical and horizontal dipole coil configurations within the low induction number regime and up to the maximum measuring limit of the equ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8a shows that the Q response progressively departs from linearity as half-space conductivity increases (that is, as the induction number increases (Figure 8b)). Figure 8a also shows this departure in terms of the relative error, E, as defined by Caminha-Maciel and Figueiredo [43]:…”
Section: Data Analysis and Processingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Figure 8a shows that the Q response progressively departs from linearity as half-space conductivity increases (that is, as the induction number increases (Figure 8b)). Figure 8a also shows this departure in terms of the relative error, E, as defined by Caminha-Maciel and Figueiredo [43]:…”
Section: Data Analysis and Processingmentioning
confidence: 71%