2002
DOI: 10.1007/s001700200011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of a Serial–Parallel Type Machine Tool

Abstract: In order to evaluate the accuracy of a serial-parallel type machine tool, an error analysis is presented. Two different methods are adopted to derive the error model, namely the linkage kinematic analysis and the differential vector method, by which the effects of strut manufacturing tolerance and actuating error on the tool position and pose are investigated. The computational results show the influences of the actuating error and the strut length error on the machine tool inaccuracies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the basic modelling method, many scholars established PKM error models considering connection errors, guide errors, and clearance errors. For lower mobility parallel mechanisms such as the 3-PRS, Zhao et al 21 built an error model considering manufacturing and assembling tolerance errors of prismatic pairs (P). Wang et al 22,23 established an error model including hinge joint errors of a revolute joint (R), a spherical joint (S), and zero errors of a prismatic pair, but ignored the straightness errors of the guide rail and orientation errors of the revolute joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the basic modelling method, many scholars established PKM error models considering connection errors, guide errors, and clearance errors. For lower mobility parallel mechanisms such as the 3-PRS, Zhao et al 21 built an error model considering manufacturing and assembling tolerance errors of prismatic pairs (P). Wang et al 22,23 established an error model including hinge joint errors of a revolute joint (R), a spherical joint (S), and zero errors of a prismatic pair, but ignored the straightness errors of the guide rail and orientation errors of the revolute joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] However, accuracy synthesis is a process closely related with current processing capability in practical production. Multiple obscure and fluctuant factors dynamically affects the whole manufacturing process in an enterprise, and the optimized solution made by referring local manufacturing condition may possibly lack robustness in the following application, thus, a set of solutions with global sense should be developed so as to tolerate possible failures due to process instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to multiple error sources such as kinematic errors due to manufacturing tolerances, permanent deformation or wear, errors due to internal and external temperature variations [4,5], reaction to cutting forces and errors due to the mass of the structure and any payload [6]. The measurement of errors associated with HPKMs has been described by a number of authors [7][8][9][10]. To further improve the performance of HPKMs without incurring a high level of additional cost, practical and robust methods to compensate for the most significant errors are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%