2015
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates for the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock model

Abstract: Abstract. There are many complementing strategies to estimate the extrapolation errors of a model which was calibrated in least-squares fits. We consider the SkyrmeHartree-Fock model for nuclear structure and dynamics and exemplify the following five strategies: uncertainties from statistical analysis, covariances between observables, trends of residuals, variation of fit data, dedicated variation of model parameters. This gives useful insight into the impact of the key fit data as they are: binding energies, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the charge radius of 44 Ca is increased, and that of 48 Ca is reduced, with respect to the Fy(std) prediction. While the properties of the charge form factor of 48 Ca are well reproduced by Fy(∆r), this is not the case for of 44 Ca, where a good agreement for r ch is obtained at the cost of underestimating σ ch and overestimating of R diff . Another interesting lesson offered by Fig.…”
Section: Ca Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, the charge radius of 44 Ca is increased, and that of 48 Ca is reduced, with respect to the Fy(std) prediction. While the properties of the charge form factor of 48 Ca are well reproduced by Fy(∆r), this is not the case for of 44 Ca, where a good agreement for r ch is obtained at the cost of underestimating σ ch and overestimating of R diff . Another interesting lesson offered by Fig.…”
Section: Ca Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The functionals with the full Fayans pairing, namely Fy(∆r), Fy(∆r, ∆r oe ), and Sk+PFy, perform well up to 48 Ca. However, the δ⟨r 2 ⟩ values in 49−52 Ca are underestimated in all models except for Fy(∆r).…”
Section: Ca Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can omit a group from the pool of fit data. Comparison with the full fit allows to explore the impact of the omitted group, see [94] and section 6.2.…”
Section: Variations Of Fit Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis following this strategy was already given in [94]. We repeat part of that material for a reduced set of variations and, on the other hand, add new variations.…”
Section: Impact Of Groups Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%