2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03707-8_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Aerodynamic Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tolerances have been specified within the European Union project ADIGMA as representative of industrial requirements [41]. Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tolerances have been specified within the European Union project ADIGMA as representative of industrial requirements [41]. Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows the C D coefficient computed at each adaptation cycle for the three methodologies and compared against the uniform refinement and Richardson extrapolation results. Note that, in this case, the adjoint C D tolerance was lowered to 0.0001 because the initial mesh already yields a drag value clearly below industrial tolerance [41]. Assuming that the correct value is obtained by uniform refinement, the featured based method gives a totally wrong result.…”
Section: High Transonic Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, in a sense, qualitatively similar in character to the adjoint solutions computed for first-order hyperbolic conservation laws, when the functional of interest is a point evaluation of the primal solution, cf. [30,32], for example. However, in this setting, we do observe some growth in the height of the δ´type adjoint solution along the path of interest, as we move from the release point to the boundary of the computational domain Ω.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation seeks to determine whether some physical quantity of interest, calculated using the numerical solution, is within a given tolerance of the true value. Goal-oriented techniques for a posteriori error estimation were introduced in [6,25]; see also [7,8,26,29,30,31,32,33,34,38,39,45], and the references cited therein. The formulation in [6] constructs an adjoint-weighted error bound, whilst the alternative formulation in [25] constructs an unweighted error bound based on exploiting stability estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the main reasons for this increase of interest in DG methods is that allowing for discontinuities across elements gives extraordinary flexibility in terms of mesh design and choice of shape functions. Additionally, hp-DG, which are based on locally refined meshes and variable approximation orders, have been shown to achieve tremendous gains in computational efficiency for challenging problems [6,7,8,9,10,1,11,12,13].…”
Section: Discrete Eigenvalue Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%