1985
DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(85)90030-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the electrochemical evaluation of very small corrosion rates—II. Other electrochemical techniques applied to corrosion of steel in concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). As some researchers [45] have suggested, a suitable scan rate can be selected on the basis of actual onsite measurement conditions. In the present case, the effect is relatively weaker in the potential scan rate range from 0.3 to 1.0 mV/s.…”
Section: Lpr Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). As some researchers [45] have suggested, a suitable scan rate can be selected on the basis of actual onsite measurement conditions. In the present case, the effect is relatively weaker in the potential scan rate range from 0.3 to 1.0 mV/s.…”
Section: Lpr Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only more recently, the performance of CP applications has been studied, using electrochemical techniques as polarization resistance or impedance spectroscopy [19,38,39]. Different approaches hold for the performance of the electrochemical measurements and their applicability to reinforced cement-based materials, including possible errors, when measuring corrosion parameters [12,35,[40][41][42][43][44]. Therefore, the applicability of electrochemical techniques, especially in systems like reinforced cement-based materials, being relatively more complex [45], is subject to certain limitations, as already reported and discussed in numerous works [12,40,41,43,44,46].…”
Section: Previous Research and Motivation For The Present Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,35 Relevant to dc measurements, like photoresist ͑PR͒, the above considerations for possible errors, applicability, and reliability hold as well, as reported elsewhere. 2,3,11,16,36,37 In the case where corrosion rates have to be derived from PR measurements, complications and errors arise related to the following factors: 17,18 not known Tafel slopes, lack of linearity of the polarization curve in the region of corrosion potential, lack of steady state, equilibrium potentials of anodic and cathodic reactions very close to the corrosion potential, etc. Although the drawbacks of the technique are well known, it is widely applicable for fast evaluation of electrochemical behavior ͑for example, deriving R p as in this study͒ for reinforced concrete or mortar systems.…”
Section: Applicability Of Electrochemical Techniques To Reinforced Cementioning
confidence: 99%