2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESG, liquidity, and stock returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
6
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value of ESG is 3.468, the minimum and maximum values are 1 and 8, respectively, and the standard deviation is 2.521, indicating that the ESG ratings of the companies in the sample differ significantly and the level of ESG disclosure needs to be improved. The mean value of SGR is 0.0399, and the minimum and maximum values are 0.0308 and 0.1568, respectively, which are similar to existing studies (Luo et al, 2022), indicating that there is great variability in the sustainability level of the sample companies; Individual differences were also observed in the sample for the main control variables, and the distribution of the control variable values were within a reasonable range. Overall, the sample was well differentiated.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean value of ESG is 3.468, the minimum and maximum values are 1 and 8, respectively, and the standard deviation is 2.521, indicating that the ESG ratings of the companies in the sample differ significantly and the level of ESG disclosure needs to be improved. The mean value of SGR is 0.0399, and the minimum and maximum values are 0.0308 and 0.1568, respectively, which are similar to existing studies (Luo et al, 2022), indicating that there is great variability in the sustainability level of the sample companies; Individual differences were also observed in the sample for the main control variables, and the distribution of the control variable values were within a reasonable range. Overall, the sample was well differentiated.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Compared with the ESG development process in foreign countries and Hong Kong, China, ESG construction in mainland China is relatively backward and still in the initial stage of development, mainly because mainland China adopts the voluntary principle for ESG report disclosure, while the Hong Kong Stock Exchange follows mandatory disclosure requirements (Luo et al, 2022). In recent years, stock exchanges and the Securities and Futures Commission have also made further regulations on corporate environmental, social as well as governance disclosure and proposed a core index system for measuring ESG performance of listed companies to further promote the development of ESG in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the impact of ESG on the market value and financial performance of corporates has been widely discussed. Under this topic, scholars have studied ESG's impact on stock pricing (Mǎnescu, 2011), corporate profitability (Brogi & Lagasio, 2018), stock value (Lo & Kwan, 2017; Luo, 2022), corporate financing decisions (Limkriangkrai et al, 2017, consumer satisfaction and corporate brand image (Koh et al, 2022). These studies affirm the broad and profound impact of ESG on corporates but also argue that a corporates' profitability and ESG performance are the determinants of whether ESG has a positive impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Meng, and Zhang (2022) found the disclosure of environmental information in China harms investor response in terms of cumulative stock return and this impact is even greater in companies with high pollution and institutional participation. Similarly, Luo (2022) showed United Kingdom companies with higher environmental, social, and governance engagement scores have lower stock returns.…”
Section: Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Ret...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the international scenario, it was observed that most parts of the studies showed a positive relation between CSR and the return on share (Vergalli, & Poddi, 2009;Dhaliwal, Li, Tsang, & Yang, 2011;Becchetti, Ciciretti, Hasan, & Kobeissi, 2012;Xi, Chen, Li, & Xia, 2020;Roy, Rao, & Zhu, 2022;Boubaker, Liu, & Zhan, 2022). A few studies showed that CSR information negatively reflects the share price (Campos & Lemme, 2009;Meng & Zhang, 2022;Luo, 2022). In Brazilian investigations, the study of Boente, and Cavalcanti (2012) and Souza, Junior, Andrade e Fernandes (2019) are highlighted, which did not show any association between CSR practices and the return on share; the research by Salgado, Silva, and Araújo (2015) found a negative relation between the themes, and Dalmacio and Buoso (2016) and Hopata, Ribeiro, and Gerigs (2020) evidenced a positive relationship between CSR and return on share.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%